Of Repentance unto Life

Section I. — Repentance unto life is an evangelical grace,1 the doctrine whereof is to be preached by every minister of the gospel, as well as that of faith in Christ.2

Section II. — By it a sinner, out of the sight and sense, not only of the danger, but also of the filthiness and odiousness of his sins, as contrary to the holy nature and righteous law of God, and upon the apprehension of his mercy in Christ to such as are penitent, so grieves for and hates his sins, as to turn from them all unto God,3 purposing and endeavoring to walk with him in all the ways of his commandments.*

1 Zcch. xii. 10 j Acts xi. 18. — 2 Luke xxiv. 47; Mark i. 15; Acts xx. 21. — * Ezek. xviii. 30, 31; xxxvi. 31; Isa, xxx. 22; Ps. li. 4; Jer. xxxi. 18, 19; Joel ii. 12, 13; Amos v. 15; Ps. cxix. 128; 2 Cor. vii. 11. — * Ps. cxix. 6, 59, 106; Luke i. 6; 2 Kings xxiii. 25.

These Sections teach the following truths: 1st. That as to the grounds of it, true evangelical repentance rests upon (a) a true sense of the guilt, pollution and power of his own sinfulness, and of his own sinful deeds; and (6) a true apprehension of the mercy of God in Christ.

2d. That as to the essence of it repentance consists (a) in true hatred of sin and sorrow for his own sin; (b) in an actual turning from them all unto God; (c) in a sincere purpose and practical endeavour to walk with God in the way of his commandments.

3d. That as thus defined this true repentance is an evangelical grace, like faith freely given to lis by God for Christ’s sake, as well as a duty obligatory upon us.

4th. It should therefore be diligently proclaimed from the pulpit by every minister of the gospel.

1st. The grounds of repentance are (1) a true sense of sin. That spiritual illumination and renewal of the affections which are effected in regeneration brings the believer to see and appreciate the holiness of God as revealed alike in the law and in the gospel (Rom. iii. 20; Job xlii. 5, 6); and in that light to see and feel the exceeding sinfulness of all sin, and the utter sinfulness of his own nature and conduct. This sense of sin corresponds precisely to the actual facts of the case, and the man apprehends himself to be just as God has always seen him to be. It includes (a) consciousness of guilt — i. e., exposure to merited punishment, as opposed to the justice of God. Ps. li. 4, 9. (6.) Consciousness of pollution, as opposed to the holiness of God. Ps. li. 5, 7, 10. And (c) consciousness of helplessness. Ps. li. 11; cix. 21,22.

The grounds of repentance are (2) a bright apprehension of the mercy of God in Christ. This is necessary in order to true repentance: (a.) Because the awakened. conscience echoes God’s law, and can be appeased by no less a propitiation than that demanded by divine justice itself; and until this is realized in a believing application to the merits of Christ, either indifference will stupefy or remorse will torment the soul. (6.) Because out of Christ, God is a consuming fire, and an inextin- ’ guishable dread of his wrath repels the soul. Deut. iv

24; Heb. xii. 29. (c.) A sense of the amazing goodness of God to us in the gift of his Son, and of our ungrateful requital of it, is the most powerful means of bringing the soul to genuine repentance for sin as committed against God. Ps. li. 4. (<:?.) This is proved by the examples of repentance recorded in Scripture. Ps. li. 1; cxxx. 4, and by the universal experience of Christians in modern times.

2d. As to its essence true repentance consists (1) in a sincere hatred of sin (Ps. cxix. 128, 136), and sorrow for our own sin. Sin is seen to be exceeding sinful in the light of the divine holiness, the law of God, and especially of the cross of Christ. The more we see of God in the face of Christ, the more we abhor ourselves and repent in dust and ashes. Job xlii. 5; Ezek. xxxvi. 31. Godly sorrow worketh repentance to salvation not to be repented of. 2 Cor. vii. 10. “By the law is the knowledge of sin” (Rom. iii. 20), and hence “the law is our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ.” Gal. iii. 24.

The essence of repentance consists (2) in our actual turning from all sin unto God. This is that practical turning or “conversion” from sin unto God which is the instant and necessary consequence of regeneration. It is a voluntary forsaking of sin as evil and hateful, with sincere sorrow, humiliation and confession, and a turning unto God as our reconciled Father in the exercise of implicit faith in the merits and assisting grace of Christ. This is marked by the meaning of the Greek word used by the Holy Spirit to express the idea of repentance, namely, “a change of mind,” including’ evidently a change of thought, feeling and purpose, corresponding to our new character as the children of God. If this be sincere, it will of course lead to the (3) element of practical repentance, namely, a sincere purpose of, and a persevering endeavour after, new obedience. Acts xx vi. 20.

By these marks it may be seen that repentance unto life can only be exercised by a soul after and in consequence of its regeneration by the Holy Spirit. God regenerates, and we, in the exercise of the new gracious ability thus given, repent. Repentance and conversion, therefore, are terms applying often to the same gracious experience. The scriptural usage of the two words differs in two respects: (1.) Conversion is the more general term, including all the various experiences involved in our commencing the divine life. It especially emphasizes that experience as a turning unto God. Repentance is more specific, giving prominence to the work of t’he law upon the conscience, and especially emphasizing the experiences attending the new birth as a turning from sin. (2.) Conversion is generally used to designate only the first actings of the new nature at the commencement of a religious life, or the first steps of a return to God after a notable backsliding (Luke xxii. 32); while repentance is a daily experience of the Christian as Ions; as the struggle with sin continues in his heart and life. Ps. xix. 12, 13; Luke ix. 32; Gal. vi. 14; v. 24.

There is a false repentance experienced before regeneration, and by those never regenerated, which arises simply from the common operations of the truth and Spirit upon the natural conscience, exciting simply a sense of guilt and pollution, leading neither to the hatred of sin, nor to the apprehension of the mercy of God in Christ, nor to the practical turning from sin unto God. The genuineness of true repentance is proved (a) by its being conformed perfectly to the requirements and teachings of Scripture, and (b) by its fruits. If genuine, it infallibly springs from regeneration and leads to eternal life.

3d. As thus defined, repentance is, like faith, an evangelical grace, given to us for Christ’s sake, as well as a duty obligatory upon us. What is here said of repentance is equally true of every characteristic experience of the subject of regeneration and sanctification. Christ is the Vine; we are the branches. But we are also free, accountable agents. Every Christian du’y is, therefore, a grace, “for without him we can do nothing.” And equally every Christian grace is a duty; because the grace is given to us to exercise, and it finds its true result and expression only in the duty.

That it is thus a gift of God is evident — (1.) From its nature. It involves true conviction of sin; a holy hatred of sin; faith in the Lord Jesus and his work, which faith is God’s gift. Gal. v. 22; Eph. ii. 8. (2.) It is directly affirmed in Scripture. Zech. xii. 10; Acts v. 31; xL 18; 2 Tim. ii. 25.

4th. That it should be diligently preached by every minister of the gospel is (1) self-evident from the essential nature of the duty. (2.) Because such preaching was included in the commission Christ gave to the apostles. Luke xxiv. 47, 48, (3.) Because of the example of the apostles. Acts xx. 21.

Section III. — Although repentance be not to be rested in, a* any satisfaction for sin or any cause of the pardon thereof,5 which is the act of God’s free grace in Christ,6 yet is it of such necessity to all sinners that none may expect pardon without it.7

Section IV. — As there is no sin so small but it deserves damnation,8 so there is no sin so great that it can bring damnation upon those who truly repent.9

Section V. — Men ought not to content themselves with a general repentance, but it is every man’s duty to endeavour to repent of his particular sins particularly.10

6 Ezek. xxxvi. 31, 32; xvi. 61-63. — 6 Hos. xiv. 2, 4; Rom. iii. 24; Eph. i. 7. — 7 Luke xiii. 3, 5; Acts xvii. 30, 31. — 8 Roru. vi. 23; v. 12; Matt. xii. ,36. — Isa. lv. 7; Rom. viii. 1; Isa. i. 16, 18. — 10 Ps. xix. 13; Luke xix. 8 j 1 Tim. i. 13, 15.

These Sections teach the following propositions:

1st. That repentance is not to be rested in, as any satisfaction for sin or any cause of the pardon thereof.

2d. That, nevertheless, it is of such necessity that it is inseparable from pardon, so that none who are nonrepentant are pardoned.

3d. That while the least sin deserves condemnation, the same grace of Christ which bringeth repentance avails to extinguish the guilt of the greatest sin.

4th. That, as men ought to repent of their sinful disposition by nature and the general sinfulness of their lives, so they ought also to repent of every particular sin known to them.

1st. Repentance is not to be rested in as any satisfaction for sin or any cause of the pardon thereof. This directly contradicts the opinion of Socinians, the advocates of the moral-influence theory of the atonement, and Rationalists generally, to the effect that the repentance of the sinner is the only satisfaction the law requires, and hence the only condition God demands, as prerequisite to full pardon and restoration to divine favour.

It also contradicts the Romish doctrine of penance. They distinguish penance — (1.) As a virtu? which is internal, including sorrow for sin and a timing from sin unto God. (2.) As a sacrament, which is the external expression of the internal state. This sacrament consists (a) of contrition — i. e., sorrow and detestation of past sins, with a purpose of sinning no more; (b) confession or self-accusation to a priest having jurisdiction and the power of the keys; (c) satisfaction or some painful work, imposed by the priest and performed by the penitent, to satisfy divine justice for sins committed; and (d) absolution, pronounced by the priest judicially and not merely declaratively. They hold that the element of satisfaction included in this sacrament makes a real satisfaction for sin, and is an efficient cause of pardon, absolutely essential — the only means whereby the pardon of sins committed after baptism can be secured.*

That repentance is no cause whatever of the pardon of sin is proved by all that the Scriptures teach us (a) as to the justice of God, which inexorably demands the punishment of every sin; (b) as to the necessity for the satisfaction rendered to the law and justice of God by the obedience and suffering of Christ; (c) as to the fact that he has rendered a full satisfaction in behalf of all for whom he died; (d) as to the impossibility of any man’s securing justification by works of any kind; and (e) as to the fact that the believer is justified solely on the ground of the righteousness of Christ imputed to him and received by faith alone. All these points have already been discussed under their appropriate heads; and they are more than sufficient to prove (1) that par- * Cat. Rom., Part, ii., chap, v., Qp. 12 and 13.

don is secured entirely on a different basis; (2) that the external penance of the Romanist is an impertinent attempt to supplement the perfect satisfaction of Christ; and (3) that internal repentance, when genuine, is itself a gracious gift of God, without merit in itself, and of value only because it springs from the application of Christ’s grace to the soul and leads to the application by the soul to Christ’s grace.

2d. Nevertheless, repentance is of such necessity to all f sinners that none may expect pardon without it. This is evident — (1) Because the giving of pardon to a nonrepentant sinner would be in effect to sanction his sin, to confirm him in his sinful state, and to encourage others therein. Although Scripture and the moral sense of men teach that repentance is no adequate satisfaction for sin nor an equivalent for the penalty, they just as clearly teach that it would be inconsistent in every sense with good morals to pardon a person cherishing an unrepentant spirit. (2.) Repentance is the * natural and instant sequence of the grace of regeneration. It also embraces an element of faith in Christ, and that faith is, as we have seen, the instrument of justification. He that repents believes. He that does not repent does not believe. He that does not believe! is not justified. Regeneration and justification are never separated. (3.) The design of Christ’s work is to save his people from their sins. He frees them from the guilt of their sins by pardon, and he brings them clear from the power of their sins through repentance. “Him hath God exalted, .... to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins.” Acts v. 31. (4.) Repentance, like faith, is a duty as well as a grace, and ministers are commaided to preach it as essential to forgiveness. Luke xxiv. 47; Acts xx. 21.

3d. That the least sin deserves punishment is obvious. The moral law is moral in every element, and it is of the essence of that which is moral that it is obligatory, and that its violation is deserving of reprobation. Hence “whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, is guilty of all.” James ii. 10. That there is no sin so great that it can bring condemnation upon those that truly repent is also evident, because true repentance, as we have seen, is the fruit of regeneration, and no man is regenerated who is not also justified. Besides, true repentance includes faith, and faith unites to Christ and secures the imputation of his righteousness, and the righteousness of Christ of course cancels all possible sin. Rom. viii. 1; v. 20.

4th. That men ought to repent not only in general of the corruption of their hearts and sinfulness of their lives, but also of every particular sinful action of which they are conscious and that when possible they should redress the wrong done by their actions, is a dictate alike of natural conscience and Scripture. Luke xix. 8; 1 John i. 9. No man has any right to presume that he hates sin in general unless he practically hates every sin in particular; and no man has any right to presume that he is sorry for and ready to renounce his own sins in general unless he is conscious of practically renouncing and grieving for each particular sin into which he falls.

Section VI. — As every man is bound to make private confession of his sins to Grod, praying for the pardon thereof;11 upon which, and the forsaking of them, he shall find mercy ;12 so he that scandalizeth his brother, or the Church of Christ, ought to be willing, by a private or public confession and sorrow for his sin, to declare his repentance to those that are offended ;13 who are thereupon to be reconciled to him, and in love to receive him.1*

11 Ps. li. 4, 5, 7, 9, 14; xxxii. 5, 6. — 12 Prov. xxviii. 13; 1 John i. 9. — 13 James v. 16; Luke xvii. 3, 4 j Josh. vii. 19 j Ps. li. —” 2 Cor. ii. 8.

This Section teaches —

1st. That every man should make private confession of all his sins to God, and that God will certainly pardon him when his sorrow and his renunciation of his sins are sincere. This is all included in what has already been said as to the nature and effects of genuine repentance; and it is expressly declared in Scripture: “If we confess our sins, he (God) is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” 1 John i. 9.

2d. That when a Christian has personally injured a brother, or scandalized by his unchristian conduct the Church of Christ, he ought to be willing, by a public or a private confession, as the case may be, to declare his repentance to those that are offended, is also a dictate alike of natural reason and Scripture. If we have done wrong, we stand in the position of one maintaining a wrong until, by an expressed repentance and, where possible, redress of the wrong, we place ourselves on the side of the right. The wrong-doer is plainly in debt to the man he has injured to make every possible restitution to his feelings and interests, and the same principle holds true in relation to the general interests of the Christian community. The duty is expressly commanded in Scripture. Matt, v, 23, 24; James v. 16; Matt, xviii. 15-18.

3d. That it is the duty of the brethren or of the Church, when offended, to forgive the offending party and restore him fully to favour upon his repentance, is also a dictate of natural conscience and of Scripture. All honourable men feel themselves bound to act upon this principle. The Christian is, in addition, brought under obligations to forgive others by his own infinite obligations to his Lord, who not only forgave us upon repentance, but died to redeem us while we were unrepentant. As to public scandals, the Church is bound to forgive them when the Lord has done so. As genuine repentance is the gift of Christ, its evident exercise is a certain indication that the person exercising it is forgiven by Christ and a Christian brother. Luke xvii. 3, 4; 2 Cor. ii. 7, 8; Matt. vi. 7.

The Romish Church teaches that, as an element of penance and evidence of true repentance, the Christian must confess all his sins without reserve, in all their details and qualifying circumstances, to a priest having jurisdiction; and that if any mortal sin is unconfessed it is not forgiven; and if the omission is wilful, it is sacrilege, and greater guilt is incurred.* And they maintain that the priest absolves judicially, not merely declaratively, from all the penal consequences of the sins confessed, by the authority of Jesus Christ.

This is an obvious perversion of the scriptural command to confess. They bid us simply to confess our faults one to another. There is not a word said about confession to a priest in the Bible. The believer, on the contrary, has immediate access to Christ, and to God through Christ (1 Tim. ii. 5 j John xiv. 6; v. 40; Matt. * Cat. B mil, Part ii., ch. v., Qs. 33, 34, 42.

xi. 28), and is commanded to confess his sins immediately to God. 1 John i. 9. No priestly function is ever ascribed to the Christian ministry in the New Testament. The power of absolute forgiveness of sin belongs to God alone (Matt. ix. 2-6), is incommunicable in its very nature, and has never been granted to any class of men as a matter of fact. The authority to bind or loose which Christ committed to his Church was understood by the apostles, as is evident from their practice, as simply conveying the power of declaring the conditions on which God pardons sin, and, in accordance with that declaration, of admitting or of excluding men from sealing ordinances.

QUESTIONS.

1. What is the first truth taught in the first and second Sections?

2. What is the second taught?

3. What is the third f

4. What is the fourth?

5. What does a true sense of sin include?

6. Show how it leads to repentance.

7. Show that an apprehension of the mercy of God in Christ is necessary to lead to true repentance.

8. What three elements enter into genuine repentance?

9. Show that it includes a true hatred of sin and sorrow for pur own sin.

10. Show that it includes an actual turning from all sin unto God.

11. Show that it includes a sincere purpose of, and a persevering endeavour after, new obedience.

12. What distinction is maintained in the usage of the word a “conversion” and “repentance” in Scripture?

13. What is a false repentance, and how may a genuine repentance be discriminated from it?

14. What is meant when it is affirmed that every Christian duty is a Christian grace?

15. Prove that repentance is an evangelical grace.

16. Why should it be diligently preached?

17. What two propositions are taught in Section iii.?

18. What is taught in Section iv.?

19. What in Section v.?

20. What is the Socinian or Rationalistic doctrine as to the relation of repentance to pardon?

21. What is the Romish doctrine of penance?

22. Of what three elements do they teach that external penance consists?

23. Prove that repentance is no cause whatever of the pardon of sin.

24. Prove that none are ever pardoned without repentance.

25. Prove that the least sin deserves condemnation.

26. Prove that no sin will secure condemnation in the ease of the truly penitent.

27. Prove that men ought to repent of their particular sinful actions, as well as of their sinfulness in general.

28. What is the first point affirmed in the sixth Section?

29. What is the second point affirmed there?

30. What is the third point affirmed there?

31. What does the Romish Church teach as to confession of Bins?

32. What does she teach as to absolution from sin?

33. Prove that she is wrong as to her doctrine of confession.

34. Prove that she is wrong as to priestly absolution.