An Unpublished Essay of Edwards on the Trinity

The major part of the manuscripts of Jonathan Edwards was for a good while in the hands of the late Professor Edwards A. Park, for him to use in composing a biography of Edwards which he had projected — — a task for which that eminent theological teacher was in many respects admirably qualified. This undertaking, however, owing to his advanced age and his high ideal of what the proposed biography should be, was not carried by him beyond its early preparatory stages. On his decease, in accordance with an arrangement made a number of years before with the representative of the Edwards family, by whom the papers had been lent to Professor Park, they were transferred permar nently to Yale University.

One of the manuscripts thus received, printed from a careful transcription, forms the concluding Part of the present volume. The sketch of the principal events in the life of the Author, and the characteristics of his theology, which forms the Introduction, I have thought would not be unwelcome, especially as the Fifth of October, 1903, is the two-hundredth anniversary of his birth. Prior to the more general Introduction, some statements pertaining to the literary history of the treatise which follows it will not be out of place.

viii PREFACE

Most of the persons who are interested in theological inquiries can hardly fail to be desirous to ascertain what were the thoughts of so great a theologian as Jonathan Edwards on the subject of the Trinity. A half-century ago, rumors were afloat concerning an Essay on this subject which was represented to exist in manuscript among his unpublished papers. As early as 1851 Dr. Bushnell called for the publication of a manuscript “treatise” from the pen of Edwards, which had been described to him as an “a priori argument for the Trinity,” that would occasion surprise were it suffered to appear in print. 1 In 1880, Dr. 0. W. Holmes also complained that the custodians of the Edwards manuscripts chose to withhold from the public an Essay which, he had been assured on “unquestionable authority,” was in “the direction of Arianism or Sabellianism.” 2 A few years later (about 1885), in an article in Herzog’s Real-Encyclopadie, 3 Professor Calvin E. Stowe referred to an unpublished manuscript of Edwards on the Trinity in a manner to indicate that he had examined it, since he declares it to be a very able and carefully composed dissertation manifesting boldness and independence.

The same year new light was thrown on this topic by Professor Egbert C. Smyth’s publication from a copy, which had been made long before, of a manuscript of

1 Bushnell, Christ in Theology, p. vi.

* International Review (1880), also Pages from an Old Volume of Life, p. 397.

3 Quoted by Professor A. G. Allen, Jonathan Edwards (1889), p. 341.

PREFACE ix

Edwards, which is entitled in its printed form “Observations concerning the Scripture (Economy of the Trinity and Covenant of Redemption.” The Essay itself is brief, containing about 800 words, but it is concise, and is in the characteristic style of Edwards. This small volume is increased in value by the scholarly introduction and notes of the Editor. As he remarks, however, it is not a “treatise” — the term used in the citation above from Dr. Bushnell. It deals with only one branch of the subject, which is more fully treated by its Author elsewhere. The topic of the “Observations” is the mutual relation of the Persons of the Trinity with reference to the supposed Covenant of Redemption. It manifests no leaning towards Arianism or any. other of the types of opinion usually characterized as heterodox.

In 1865 an important manuscript of Edwards was edited in Scotland and printed there for private circulation, by Rev. A. B. Grosart, 1 who had obtained it in America at a time when he had intended to prepare a collective edition of the works of Edwards. This “Treatise on Grace,” which is the title given it, comprises a full discussion of the Scriptural Doctrine of the Holy Spirit. It considers at length both the relation of the Holy Spirit to the Father and the Son, and the function and agency of the Spirit in the work of redemption. Under this last head, it is maintained that the presence and agency of the Holy Spirit is one and

1 Selections from the Unpublished Writings of Jonathan Edwards p. 19 ff.

x PREFACE

the same with the indwelling of God in the souls of believers, and is the bond connecting them with Christ, as in the immanent relations of the Deity it unites the Father and the Son.

A notable and almost epoch-making contribution on the writings and opinions of Edwards concerning the Trinity appeared in 1881, in two Articles — forming a connected whole — in the Bibliotheca Sacra, from the pen of Professor Edwards A. Park. In the first Article are copious extracts from the “Monthly Review” (April 1751) in which were recorded passages from “The Philosophical Principles of Natural and Revealed Religion,” by the Chevalier Ramsay — a work published shortly before. Ramsay was a Scotchman by birth, with a strong taste and corresponding talent for metaphysical speculation. He espoused successive phases of religious thought and belief, passing from orthodox Protestantism through Deism and, later, Scepticism, into the Roman Catholic Church. He resided for a considerable time in France, and was for a part of this period in close intercourse with Fenelon and under his influence. At the widest remove from many of Ramsay’s religious tenets, Edwards approved, as concurrent with his own, the views which Ramsay set forth, in his book, of the infinitude of God, of His activity as eternal and not originating in anything external but from within; of the analogy, up to a limit in measure, of that activity, in the human mind; of the three distinctions in the Deity, coequal in all things, self-origination only excepted. In the second Article Professor Park adverts to the refer-PREFACE xience that he had made in the first l to a manuscript of Edwards containing “remarks on the Trinity,” which, he had there said, “has been mislaid and cannot yet be found”; 2 although he also observes: “Within the last few months, and particularly the last few weeks, I have found writings of Edwards and memoranda of my own which enable me to. say with assurance what I could not have said without much diffidence. They have enabled me to recognize what without them I could not exactly recall” Later, in the second Article, 3 Professor Park proceeds to give, from notes, some account of the contents of the “mislaid,” and not yet recovered, Essay. After an interval, the vanished Essay turned up in a place not open to observation, into which, as Professor Park explained, it had accidentally fallen. He had it transcribed with much painstaking, and at his own expense. This was read in his presence by several of his clerical friends of high standing, or read to them. Notes were made of its contents by at least one of them. The Professor evidently had not a shadow of doubt of its identity with the mislaid and later discovered document which was still in his possession. It was manifest that he knew nothing of the existence of any other manuf script of Edwards to be regarded in any just sense as a rival of that which is printed in this volume. He considered this Essay, likewise, to be none other than the Writing of Edwards on the Trinity the publication of which had been repeatedly called for. There is some difficulty arising from a seeming want of harmony be- 1 P. 147. a P. 187, note. P. 359 £ xii PREFACE

Keep reading