The Antiquity of Man According to the Bible and According to Science

One of the questions that is greatly puzzling many Bible scholars to-day is, how to reconcile the chronology of the Bible with discoveries that are being made as to the antiquity of man. It is said that the Bible chronology only allows about 4000 years from Adam to Christ, but the Egyptian and Babylonian civilizations were highly developed before 4000 years before Christ. If there were but four thousand years from Adam to Christ there would, of course, be only 5907 years for the whole age of the whole human race, and historians and scientists are thought to have traced the history of the race back 10,000 or more years. How are we to reconcile these apparent discrepancies?

In the first place, let it be said that the dates commonly accepted by many historians are not at all certain. For example, in figuring out the dates of Egyptian dynasties the data upon which conclusions are built can hardly be considered decisive. It is true discoveries have been made of ancient records which assert that the dynasties which preceded them covered certain vast periods of time which are named, but anyone who is at all familiar with the ancient and Oriental habit of exaggeration should receive these assertions as to the length of these dynasties with a great deal of caution. While these views of the vast antiquity of the ancient Egyptian civilization and ancient civilizations of Nineveh and Babylon, as well, are widely accepted, they are not by any means proven, We can afford to wait for more

On the other hand, it is not at all sure that there ‘were only about 4000 years from Adam to Christ. Bishop Ussher’s chronology, which is found in the margin of most reference Bibles, is not, of course, a part of the Bible itself, and its accuracy is altogether doubtful. It is founded upon the supposition that the genealogies of Scripture are intended to be complete; but a careful study of the genealogies of Scripture clearly shows that they are not intended to be complete, that they oftentimes contain only some outstanding names. For example, the genealogy in Ex. 6: 16-24, if it were taken as a complete genealogy containing all the names, would make Moses the great-grandson of Levi, though 430 years intervened. Again there is reason to question whether the list of names in Gen. 5 and 11 is complete. “The total length of time from Adam te the Flood, and from the Flood to Abraham, is never mentioned in Scripture, although the period from Joseph to Moses (Ex. 12: 40) and that from the Exodus to the building of the temple (1 Kings 6:1) are mentioned.”

“The fact that there are just ten names in each list also suggests that a similar arrangement may have been made in the first chapter of Matthew.” The regular formula is, “A. lived years and begat B. And A. lived after he begat B years and begat sons and daughters. B. lived years and begat C.,” etc. The word translated “begat” is sometimes used not of an immediate descendant but of succeeding generations. For example, Zilpah is said to have borne her greatgrandchildren (Gen. 46:18). The Hebrew word translated “bare” in this passage is the same word translated “begat” in the other passages. Bilhah is said to have borne her grandchildren (Gen. 46:25). Canaan is said to have begotten whole nations (Gen. 10: 15-18), so we see that in the formula quoted above the meaning is not necessarily that B. is the literal son of A. B. may be his literal son or a distant descendant. Thus many centuries may have intervened between A. and B. Of course, no chronology is intended by these figures. Their purpose is not at all to show the age of the world. We see, therefore, that there is no real and necessary conflict between real Bible chronology and any modern historical discoveries as to the antiquity of man.

It should be said further that it may be that these ancient civilizations which are being discovered in the vicinity of Nineveh and elsewhere may be the remains of the pre-Adamic race already mentioned. There are passages in the Bible which seem to hint that there were some existing even in Bible times who may have belonged to these pre-Adamic races. Such may have been the Rephaim and Zamzummin and the Emim (see Gen. 14:5 R. V.; Deut. 2:20, 21; 3:11 A. V. and RB. V.). The hints given in those passages are somewhat obscure, but seem to suggest the remains of a race other than the Adamic race. If such was the case, these earlier civilizations which are now being uncovered may have been theirs. No one need have the least fear of any discoveries that the archeologists may make; for if it should be found that there were early civilizations thousands of years before Christ, it would not come into any conflict whatever with what the Bible really teaches about the antiquity of man, the Adamic race,