TheWayLIBRARY
Cover of Sermons on Gospel Themes
Sermons · 1876

Sermons on Gospel Themes

by Charles G. Finney

Read free online

About 12 hours to read · 24 sections

Sermons

Original 1876 text; author died 1875. US and UK terms expired.

Contents

  1. Chapter I: God’s Love for a Sinning World
  2. Chapter II: On Trusting in the Mercy of God
  3. Chapter III: The Wages of Sin
  4. Chapter IV: The Saviour Lifted Up, and the Look of Faith
  5. Chapter V: The Excuses of Sinners Condemn God
  6. Chapter VI: The Sinner’s Excuses Answered
  7. Chapter VII: On Refuges of Lies
  8. Chapter VIII: The Wicked Heart Set to Do Evil
  9. Chapter IX: Moral Insanity
  10. Chapter X: Conditions of Being Saved
  11. Chapter XI: The Sinner's Natural Power and Moral Weakness
  12. Chapter XII: On the Atonement
  13. Chapter XIII: Where Sin Occurs, God Cannot Wisely Prevent It
  14. Chapter XIV: The Inner and the Outer Revelation
  15. Chapter XV: Quenching the Spirit
  16. Chapter XVI: The Spirit Not Striving Always
  17. Chapter XVII: Christ Our Advocate
  18. Chapter XVIII: God’s Love Commended to Us
  19. Chapter XIX: Prayer and Labor for the Gathering of the Great Harvest
  20. Chapter XX: Converting Sinners a Christian Duty
  21. Chapter XXI: Men Often Highly Esteem What God Abhors
  22. Chapter XXII: Victory Over the World Through Faith
  23. Chapter XXIII: Death to Sin Through Christ
  24. Chapter XXIV: The Essential Elements of Christian Experience

Every Scripture reference in this book (17)

Articles about Sermons on Gospel Themes

From Chapter I: God’s Love for a Sinning World

The existence of sin is a fact everywhere experienced — everywhere observed. There zs sin in our race everywhere, and in awful aggravation.

Sin is the violation of an infinitely important law — a law designed and adapted to secure the highest good of the universe. Obedience to this law is naturally essential to the good of creatures. Without obedience there could be no blessedness even in heaven.

As sin is a violation of a most important law, it cannot be treated lightly. No government can afford to treat disobedience as a trifle, inasmuch as everything — the entire welfare of the government and of all the governed — turns upon obedience. Just in proportion to the value of the interests at stake is the necessity of guarding law and of punishing disobedience.

The law of God must not be dishonored by anything He shall do. It has been dishonored by the disobedience of man; hence, the more need that God should stand by it, to retrieve its honor. The utmost dishonor is done to law by disowning, disobeying, and despising it. All this, sinning man has done. Hence, this law being not only good, but intrinsically necessary to the happiness of the governed, it becomes of all things most necessary that the law-giver should vindicate his law. He must by all means do it.

Hence, sin has involved God’s government in a vast expense. Either the law must be executed at the expense of the well-being of the whole race, or God must submit to suffer the worst results of disrespect to His law — results which in some form must involve a vast expense.

Take for example any human government. Suppose the righteous and necessary laws which it imposes are disowned and dishonored. In such a case the violated law must be honored by the execution of its penalty, or something else not less expensive, and probably much more so, must be endured. ‘Transgression must cost happiness, somewhere, and in vast amount.

In the case of God’s government it has been deemed advisable to provide a substitute — one that should answer the purpose of saving the sinner, and yet of honoring the law. This being determined on, the next great question was — How shall the expense be met?

The Bible informs us how the question was in fact decided. By a voluntary conscription — shall I call it — or donation? Call it as we may, it was a voluntary offering. Who shall head the subscription? Who shall begin where so much is to be raised? Who will make the first sacrifice? Who will take the first step in a project so vast? The Bible informs us. It began with the Infinite Father. He made the first great donation. He gave His only begotten Son — this to begin with — and having given Him first, He freely gives all else that the exigencies of the case can require. First, He gave His Son to make the atonement due to law:

then gave and sent His Holy Spirit to take charge of this work. The Son on His part consented to stand as the representative of sinners that He might. honor the law, by suffering in their stead. He poured out His blood, made a whole life of suffering a free donation on the altar — withheld not His face from spitting, nor His back from stripes — shrunk not from the utmost contumely that wicked men could heap on Him. So the Holy Ghost also devotes Himself to most self-denying efforts unceasingly, to accomplish the great object.

It would have been a very short method to have turned over His hand upon the wicked of our race, and sent them all down quick to hell, as once He did when certain angels “kept not their first estate.” Rebellion broke out in heaven. Not long did God bear it, around His lofty throne. But in the case of man He changed His course — did not send them all to hell, but devised a vast scheme of measures, involving most amazing self-denials and self-sacrifices, to gain men’s souls back to obedience and heaven.

For whom was this great donation made? ‘‘God so loved the World,” meaning the whole race of men. By the ‘‘ world” in this connection cannot be meant any particular part only, but the whole race. Not only the Bible, but the nature of the case shows that the atonement must have been made for the whole world. For plainly if it had not been made for the entire race, no man of the race could ever know that it was made for himself, and therefore not a man could believe on Christ in the sense of receiving by faith the blessings of the atonement. There being an utter uncertainty as to the persons embraced in the limited provisions which we now suppose to be made, the entire donation must fail through the impossibility of rational faith for its reception. Suppose a will is made by a rich man bequeathing certain property to certain unknown persons, described only by the name of “the elect.” They are not described otherwise than by this term, and all agree that although the maker of the will had the individuals definitely in his mind, yet that he left no description of them, which either the persons themselves, the courts, nor any living mortal can understand. Now such a will is of necessity altogether null and void. No living man can claim under such a will, and none the better though these elect were described as residents of Oberlin. Since it does not embrace all the residents of Oberlin, and does not define which of them, all is lost. All having an equal claim and none any definite claim, none zan inherit. If the atonement were made in this way, no living man would have any valid reason for believing himself one of the elect, prior to his reception of the Gospel. Hence he would have no authority to believe and receive its blessings by faith. In fact, the atonement must be wholly void — on this supposition — unless a special revelation is made to the persons for whom it is intended.

As the case is, however, the very fact that a man belongs to the race of Adam — the fact that he is human, born of woman, is all-sufficient. It brings him within the pale. He is one of the world for whom God gave His Son, that whosoever would believe in Him might not perish, but have everlasting life.

The subjective motive in the mind of God for this great gift was Zove, love to the world. God so loved the world that He gave His Son to die for it. God loved the universe also, but this gift of His Son sprang from love to our world. True in this great act He took pains to provide for the interests of the universe. He was careful to do nothing that could in the least let down the sacredness of His law. Most carefully did He intend to guard against misapprehension as to His regard for His law and for the high interests of obedience and happiness in his moral universe. He meant once for all to preclude the danger lest any moral agent should be tempted to undervalue the moral law.

Keep reading

More by Charles G. Finney

Restored from a scan of the 1876 edition, with page headers and numbers removed and words rejoined across line breaks. Scan-derived text, still being proofread; compare the original scan before quoting.