The Resource of the Faithful in the Ruins of Christendom

How many elements of solemnity are crowded into the subject now before us! It is solemn to look over Christendom and survey its ruins, now too palpable to be denied. It is solemn, on the other side, to think of the faithful goodness of Grod, who knew all beforehand, spread it out in the unerring word of His grace, and has shown us that, if He felt the evil that was about to cover the scene of the profession of Christ’s name on earth, His loving wisdom descried a sure path — a path the vulture’s eye does not see, which, nevertheless, He gives His people to discern, and by means of which they can have the happy certainty that they are pleasing Grod. To those who, for the sake of the Lord and the truth, deplore, and refuse to have fellowship with the current practice of Christendom, there may be a

A certain necessity to give as strong proofs as may be of those evils which now abound, and of which the word of (rod forewarned when they were but in the germ. Indeed, there may be a kind of temptation to prove the evil, where we feel in anywise the need of a justification for the path of separation from Grod But that tendency is corrected promptly, and tht heart receives its due tone and its right attitude when we, think who, after all, is most concerned, and whose honour it is we have to justify. The Lord preserve us from thinking of ourselves! It is unworthy of those who belong to Christ. Be it our boast to justify Him alone.

It will be my business now to show, not that He needs aught from us, not that His words of light require the tapers of man to make them more distinct, but that divine charity seeks the blessing of every one, especially those who are comparatively young and uninformed in the truth of God. I hope to give enough, at least, of the evidence to show most plainly what the will of the Lord is; how faithfully His word deals with us; how worthy of trust both He Himself is and that which He has put into our hands. This may encourage the most diffident of (rod’s children to look up with confidence, seeing that the end was as plain to Him as the beginning, and that for us the only path is that of Christ, for there cannot be two. He is the way, and as there is but one Christ, so there can be, therefore, but one path that satisfies the heart and mind of Christ for those who love Him.

Am I going to produce strong reasons, as if one needed to justify this? It will be enough to explain what He has pointed out. To those who know Him, there will be the completest justification and the strongest reason, in the fact that it is His path for us, though His goodness has given, alas! too sure and abundant proof how deeply it is needed.

Further, I shall have the opportunity to-night of slightly reviewing the ground over which we have passed on previous occasions, and of showing how all that is most precious has been secured to the faithful. Not that the Lord has not been pleased to take away much. Not that we ought to be unfeeling about anything that concerns the Lord’s power and glory in the Church. But if we rightly claim a higher place for that which concerns Grod in His moral ways; if we ought to feel that what brings and keeps before us the grace of Christ must be of deeper value than any displays of power before men; yet, on the other hand, beloved brethren, it would be* a wrong to the Lord if we looked with cold indifference on the utter weakness of this our day, and the dishonour thus put upon the name of Jesus in Christendom itself. Alas! there is no place among the outside strangers to the Lord Jesus where there is more daring enormity done than in the very scene where men are baptized in His name. When we look back at times long past, at the early days of the Church’s pilgrimage on the earth, and the power of the Holy Ghost then displayed, I am persuaded we ought to feel for the wounds inflicted in the house of a 2

His friends; we ought to be grieved that the bearing of the Church was such that the Lord coul’d not outwardly pour honour upon her, but was obliged to strip her, as it were, and shame her before the enemies of His name.

Let us own all this; as also the far deeper sorrow that men so little prize the truth, so tamely feel for the honour of the Lord’s Person in Christendom, not to speak of the well-nigh universal want of feeling even what the Church is, in its barest and simplest forms, and still more the total forgetfulness of its bright portion as one with the Saviour, and of that which the Church hopes for in the day to comet Be assured that if we do not thus feel with the Lord, in our little measure, we are not in a moral condition rightly to act upon His word in present things. It is a lesson of no small importance to see that the Lord has not given us in Scripture that which admits of bare imitation. It does not suffice to take up the epistles of St. Paul, for instance, and set to work as if we were competent to put in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders here or there. It is one thing to fall back upon the word God has given us, and quite another to assume that we can reinstate the Church, now that it has been broken up and ruined. It is right to feel its low estate, but that we should now build up again that which is thus fallen, the very thought proves that the heart in this has no communion with Christ; that there is a lack of due holy distrust of self; that there is such insensibility to the true state of things now, as unfits not merely for authoritatively restoring the Church, but even for the humbleness of faith that confides in the actual resources of Christ. For it is an unvarying principle of God, that when there has been a departure from Himself, it matters not under what circumstances, or time, or place, or people — whether before the flood or since — whether in Israel or in the Church — Grod insists upon it that the first step in that which is morally good should be the sense of our real evil in His sight. When this is the case, the presumption will be far from us that we can make good that wonderful display of divine power, grace, and wisdom — the Church of GOD! It was the greatest work, so to speak, that Grod ever wrought upon the earth (next to the Cross, whereby alone such a work became possible).

God forbid that in thinking of what He has done, we should compare that which stands alone — alone throughout all eternity! But if we look at all that has ever been done upon the earth, or even the very making of heaven and earth, I say, that the work of God in His Church — the Church of God — was greater still. And now, we poor leaky vessels that could not keep the blessing, we that have been, through our own weakness and unwatchfulness, a prey to Satan’s wiles, and let in the thieves and robbers that have spoiled the house of God, are we the men to set it up again? Is this the feeling of lowly faith? If it were bad for man to go away, if it were a grievous thing for Israel to dishonour the law of God, what must it be for the Church to slight God the Holy

Grliost? It is the epistle of Christ, the habitation of God through the Spirit, the object of His most perfect love, accepted in the Beloved, even in Christ — made the righteousness of Grod in Him. What is it, then, for that Church practically to forego the glory of Grod here below — to prefer the work of their own hands to His word and Spirit — once more to bow down to idols graven by art and man’s device? Oh! it is more loathsome than that which Scripture, or even history, records of days and men infinitely less privileged.

Think not that I am exaggerating what Christendom has done or does. Nor do I wish to dilate, more than is absolutely needful, upon the painful failure of that which bears the name of Christ here below. In truth, it is not so. But let us hear what the word of Grod says upon the subject. Who would allow the thought that He speaks too strongly of that which He saw from the first, and told us was coming, as He looked into the future?

Let us begin with the Saviour Himself, and see what He intimated to His disciples should be found when He returns again to the earth, when He summons man to give an account of himself. In Luke xvii. He tells us, not that the world should become gradually changed from a wilderness to a Paradise, nor that the heathen should lay aside their false gods and the Jews their enmity to the true Messiah. On the contrary, He gives the disciples the needed warning, that it was to be as in the days of Noah, and in the days of Lot. These were times of ease and worldliness, when all mankind was rising up against God; and yet they furnished comparisons for the scenes which are to meet the Lord as He appears from heaven to judge the world. “As it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came and destroyed them all.” The self-security and love of ease will be substantially the same when the Lord is revealed, as just before the flood. Then, as of old, men will be engrossed in the ordinary matters of daily life. Spite of the law, spite of the Gospel, again is seen and will be continued that state of corruption and violence which brought the Deluge upon the earth, no less guilty than utterly unconcerned. And Christ looks onward to the day of His return: no previous millennium of holy bliss awaiting Him; no happy, rejoicing hearts, characterizing the world generally then; but, on the contrary, the same moral condition, the same indifference to God’s will and glory which preceded the flood.

After the flood, when nations and tongues began, there was another scene, more appalling and degrading, which the same book of Genesis brings before us; and this also furnishes its sad complement to the picture of the days just before the Son of man comes again. “Like also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; but the same day that Lot went out of Sodom” (most ominous words!) “it rained fire and brimstone from heaven and destroyed them all. Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.”

If we take up now the Epistles, we shall find the light shed by the Holy Ghost in no way weakens but confirms in every respect the testimony of the Lord Jesus; only that now we have, naturally, the Holy Ghost looking rather at professing Christendom, whereas our Lord made the Jews His starting point and centre.

Thus, in Rom. xi., without dwelling at length upon the chapter, the Spirit of God anticipates the end of Christendom. “Boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but the root thee.” Such is the warning given to the Gentile professor. The Jews are meant by the natural branches. They had been the depositories of promise of old, and had therefore the responsible place of testimony for God upon the earth. Hence they were the original branches of the olive tree, the line of promise and testimony on the earth which began with Abraham. But the Jews broke the law, went after idols, refused and slew the Messiah. There was a resource in the Gospel; but they refused the Gospel from heaven, as well as the Lord their King on earth. The consequence is, that the natural branches of the olive tree were broken off, and the wild olive, or Gentile, grafted into the old stock of profession. And this is the warning that is given: “Thou wilt say then, The branches were broken off, that I might be grafted in.” Has not this exactly been the feeling of Christendom? Contempt for the Jews, astonishment at their wickedness, utter insensibility as to their own condition. “Well; because of unbelief, they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. Be not high-minded, but fear: for if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest He also spare not thee. Behold therefore the goodness and severity of Grod: on them which fell, severity; but towards thee, goodness, if thou continue in His goodness.”

Let me ask any man that has the smallest fear of God, or even outward acquaintance with His word, Has Christianity continued in the goodness of God? Is there any Protestant, any Roman Catholic who thinks so? Is there any person, no matter where, no matter who — a single soul who dares to say that Christendom, the professing Gentile, has continued in the goodness of God? The Eomanist cannot think the Protestant schism continues in the goodness of God. The Protestant is assured that the Romish body is the fruit of clean departure from God into superstition; and so we might run through all existing systems. They may each plead for his own association; but who will say that even his own has continued faithful? They may believe that it means well, and would be admirable if carried out; but who would not acknowledge that it has not been carried out? that consequently no sect, no portion, no fragment even, has continued in the goodness of God? All agree that, as for the mass of profession outside themselves, it has failed to testify for the goodness of Grod. Consequently there rises up from men on every side the acknowledgment that the Gentile has not continued in it. Not that the failure is felt as it should be; not that there is adequate confession and renunciation of our common sin before Grod. Where sin is really spread out to Grod, it will not be persisted in. But, at least, there is an outward acknowledgment to a certain extent in the earth now, and quite enough to prove that Christianity has not continued in the goodness of Grod. What then says the word of the Lord? “Thou, also, shalt be cut off.” The Gentile shall be cut off for his faithlessness, as surely as the Jew was.

This, remark, is not in some prophetic portion of God’s word, which some might think ambiguous, though we do not allow the thought for a moment that any part of the word of God is so. But here, in an epistle which every Christian allows to be one of the most fundamental and comprehensive, which takes up Christianity from its elements, and through which the Lord has established souls in peace, perhaps more than through any other portion of His word; it is in this epistle to the Romans that we have the solemn announcement of the sure cutting off of the Gentiles. Not merely one part or another, but the Gentile profession is doomed of God, because it has not continued in His goodness; as truly as the Jew is now cast out from his heritage, a bye-word and a reproach to all the earth, evidently bearing his doom stamped upon his brow.

To examine many of the epistles, would more than occupy my time. Suffice it to say, that as we travel down the stream, from 2 Thessalonians, which was one of the earliest epistles written by St. Paul, to the latest, the Epistles of St. John, we have only an increasing testimony, growing more distinct and urgent and awful. As the evil grew, so the signs of judgment became more apparent. The Spirit of Grod sounds the trumpet with no uncertain sound, and wakes up the faithful where there is an ear to hear. Christendom was gradually being undermined, and would become, in no long time, the engine of opposition to Grod — would be made the theatre of the grossest evil, taking up the abominations, not only of the Jews, but of the heathen themselves, and consecrating a system of idolatry under the name of Christ and His mother, saints and angels, even more frighful and guilty than anything ever before found here below. For the very fact of praying to Peter, Paul, or the Virgin, proves that the light of Christianity must in some measure have been known, before it ended in so distressing an apostacy. Does any one think the expression “apostacy” over-strong? Allow me to tell them that the very phrase “the apostacy” is the expression of the Holy Ghost in that epistle to the Thessalonians. There we are told “there is a mystery of iniquity which now worketh.” Only there is now a hindering power. Consequently, it would not burst out into its full development all at once; it is kept in check, for a certain time, by the good hand of the Lord, for the purposes of His own grace. But the moment that this restraint was gone, then it would be no mystery any longer, but would become manifest. It is called “a (or rather” the “) falling away,” or apostacy. This must become ripe, and “the man of sin” must be revealed. Thus we have too plainly an uninterrupted succession of evil. This is the vista described in the Scripture; a succession of evil that goes on always swelling in intensity and volume, till at last, when the restraint is removed, it bursts out into a yet more fearful issue — not “the apostacy” only, but “the man of sin.” What a contrast to the Man of righteousness, when man dares to take the place of Grod in the temple of Grod!

This, then, is what Christendom is to the Christian watchman. It has not of course been realized in all its force, though I do not deny that there have been various and also growing manifestations of evil. As the apostle John tells us, “Even now there are many antichrists, whereby we know that it is the last time.” This is so much the more remarkable because he shows that the Antichrist was coming, the great token of which is that there were many antichrists then. They knew thereby it was the last time. The Spirit would not close the volume of the New Testament until the worst evil was actually there, at least in its germ; and this being so, and descried by inspiration, there was need of nothing further. The Spirit of God could, as it were, fold up the sacred roll. It was complete. The mystery of lawlessness is shown already at work, “the man of sin” is predicted; the mystery of Christ and the Church no longer hid but disclosed. Scripture had attained its full compass. There remains, not some fresh view of Christy so to speak, but contrariwise, the unfolding of that Christ whom they had already, the bringing out more intimately and appreciatively the light of the love of Grod that was in the Lord Jesus Christ from the beginning. This is the antidote to all Satan can bring — to the many antichrists, and at last to the Antichrist. I refer to it in order to give a kind of connexion between the different states — the rise, progress, and final manifestation of lawlessness. Nay, more, the lawless one is to exalt himself against the Lord of glory. The last book of the New Testament shows the millennial reign over the earth, ushered in by the destruction of the beast and the false prophet, with all their company, as Babylon had been previously destroyed.

Thus rapidly have we glanced, without entering into all the proofs of the doom of Christendom. They are patent in the general epistles, and in particular in the epistle of Jude, where a most energetic sketch is given in the compass of a single verse (11). With that power which the Spirit of Grod only knows how to convey, the shadows of Cain are sketched, then of Balaam, and finally of the gainsaying Core. Is there nothing for Christendom there? Is there no sound of sure if slumbering judgment there? “Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain;” that unnatural brother, that pretender to religion, who brought his offering to the Lord but slew the guiltless. Is there no presage in him who received the wages of unrighteousness — in the man who, spite of himself, prophesied glorious things of a people that he loved not, but would have sold to destruction? Is there no solemn lesson in the wages received for teaching, it may be, the glorious things of God, without heart for His people, still less any care or jealousy for His word, for His will, for His glory? Finally, in that fearful rebellion of Korah, “the gainsaying of Core,” in those who had the ministry of the sanctuary, in the proud Levites who coveted and arrogated to themselves the place of Moses and Aaron (the apostle and the high priest of the Jewish profession), is there no awful warning there? Have you never heard of men professing to be servants of Christ, and yet pretending to be priests strictly, officially, and exclusively — pretending to be authoritative channels of divine pardon, empowered on earth to absolve from guilt before God? I do not speak only of such as claim in their heathenish darkness to offer a sacrifice for the dead as well as the living. Assuredly one thinks not with bitterness about such things as these, but we may all stand aghast as we survey the facts realized in Christendom. If it be a prophecy, it is a prophecy fulfilled. All this may suffice to show how little Christendom has continued in the goodness of God. Details are needless. The godliest members of the various religious societies would be the first to confess the failure of their own. God’s controversy is not with one only, but with all, though doubtless the proudest will meet with a peculiar judgment. It is evident, also, that the word of God leaves it not to human experience or to spiritual judgment to infer His thoughts of Christendom; He has pronounced upon it Himself. Hence it is not presumptuous, but on the contrary the part of humble faith, to believe God in this. How good He is thus to cut off the fear of forming a judgment so stern! For now he that does not pronounce after the Lord, is ignorant of his Master’s mind, or is false to His will. He that would defend or justify Christendom, does not, in effect, fear to give the Lord the lie. From the Scriptures enough has been given to show that the man who can look on Christendom and vindicate what is around us, ignorantly or wilfully slights all the instruction that the Holy Ghost has given on the subject. Undoubtedly this is strong; but it is the Lord’s goodness which makes the owning of it now to be a matter of sjTnpathy with Him, and not of a proud claim to superior light.

God’s word is open to all. By it we are all bound to see as He sees. The Lord admits of no vain excuses, that we cannot judge. The Spirit of God, who judges and discerns all things, dwells in every Christian. He that says he cannot judge Christendom, virtually denies himself to be a spiritual man; but if we do judge that Christendom has fallen into these predicted evils, one after another, and that what was then but budding, is now bearing the most bitter and baneful fruit, I ask, are we to partake of it? Are we to be insensible to our own share of the common sin? If the Lord graciously imparts the strongest warning, are we to satisfy ourselves with that flimsiest and most profane of apologies, that when the Lord comes, He will set it all right? Yes, but it will be too late to set right my conscious, Christ-dishonouring unfaithfulness; it will be to my shame to live till then indifferent to His word, careless of His glory, regardless of the Holy Grhost, who is grieved by that which I have been allowing practically. Am I, or am I not, to refrain from that which insults Him? If I know these things, am I to content myself without doing them? He who does, puts himself in the guiltiest place of all. Do I know and feel the despite Christendom does, and I have done, to the Spirit of grace? Then let me look up in dependence on the Lord, that I may do it no more, nor settle down in a pretext so lame and criminal, as that the Lord will set all to rights again. Is He not coming to judge every evil way? No doubt, He will bring in good, and this from above; but He will judge all evil, and yet more than in times past. In vain, then, do I essay to shelter myself under the blessed truth, that the Lord is coming to display the kingdom of God upon earth. Assuredly, He will. From the heavens He will come, and fill the earth with the peace and blessing He brings with Himself, instead of finding here below. A few poor broken hearts He will find in the world — a godly remnant, crying out, like the importunate widow in the guilty city where ruled the judge that feared neither God nor man. Such and worse will be the state of things, and in their midst shall He find faith on the earth? Yes, but crying out in alarm. And so He will clear the world with the avenging sword, before He establishes His throne of righteousness upon it. Of course, I speak figuratively now; but the fact will be unsparing divine judgment; and therefore how blind for any to harden themselves, in going on with sin, under the plea that the Lord is coming to set the world and Church to rights!

Allow me to say tether, that the Lord has not left us to our own thoughts any more of the good than of the evil. He has given us His path, and this is what the heart desires to come to — the resources of the faithful in the ruins of Christendom. It were strange indeed if the word of Grod shed no sure light where it is so needed? Can we conceive such a thing as the Lord giving His view of the darkening future, and no provident care for His beloved, and feeble, and trembling followers? We began with the Lord’s testimony about man’s evil; let us see how He ensures good for His people in the midst of it. For Matt, xviii. we may bless the Lord. Although He is giving instruction as to the animating spring of the assembly, which is grace, (as law was the governing principle of the synagogue,) the Lord provides what would be deeply needed, if they were reduced to a handful. “Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them” (ver. 20). Could one conceive more tender thought, or more evident wisdom than the Lord thus caring for His own in a dark day? To this the goodly flock might come; that assembly which once stood out so fair, with its thousands on whom great grace rested. How wise thus to. prepare the hearts of His servants! How well He knew and guarded against the anxieties of His servants! We know what numbers are to the worldly spirit, and how apt we are to rest upon that which looks great in the earth. Yet nothing is more destructive of Christianity. He that has not a heart for the two or three, must be only a dead weight if he were among ten thousand. It might be, no doubt, that he would be carried along the stream of happy multitudes; and that which was thus unfaithful to the mind of Christ, might pass unnoticed in the strong current and new-born delight in the Saviour, transporting all around, as was no doubt the case on that bright day when the Holy Grhost came down from heaven to be the herald of the glory of the Lord, and to make believing men on earth the dwelling-place of Grod. We can understand that at Pentecost the tide of joy rose so high as to cover all such elements, sure as they were to appear later on.

And soon it came, too soon, when sounds of discontent were heard even in that blessed habitation of God, Alas! man was there; not Grod only, in

His goodness, but man; and behind was the adversary, ready to dishonour the one through the other.

The Church, like man and Israel, has to be tried on earth. What is the declared issue? Never was there such blessing entrusted to man; but man is as faithless under the Grospel as he was rebellious under the law. The Holy Grhost is slighted, as the Son had been; and in the day when eternal realities are revealed, man turns back to the shadows of Judaism, preferring them to the substantial truth of (rod. This is the history of Christendom. Anri the Lord, with it all spread out before His prescient eyes, comforts His followers, were they ever so few and weak, with the assurance of His presence where His name has its central place to their faith.

In the prospect of coming evil, how gracious of the Lord to think, it may be, of some obscure village — of some solitary ship that travels across the ocean — of some comparatively desert island — yea, or of the vast and crowded city, where the very solitariness of discipleship is more realized sometimes than anywhere else! “Wherever, however, whenever it might be, the Lord gives His own weight of authority to the two or three gathered unto His name. It is not merely His blessing-j-where could He not bless? Blessing He went on high, and never since — if I may so say — never has He laid down the hands which He then lifted up in blessing. It could not be otherwise, till He come in judgment. His work was infinite. Who could limit the preciousness of His

B 2 blood? Who could say that redemption, like the first covenant, was grown old, and ready to vanish away? Could any difficulty, danger, or need in Christendom turn that grace back, as it were, into its spring, or dry up those rivers of living waters which they that believe should receive? It could not be; but there is more than all that here. Not only is there blessing, but there is also the weight of His authority guaranteed to the smallest real representative of His assembly. We know that men shrink back from Church discipline; and he need not wonder at this who is aware how it was made the most abominable scourge of tyranny, under the fairest pretences, the earth ever beheld. One cannot, therefore, be surprised that Christians who had escaped from the weight of that iron hand should somewhat shrink back at the bare sound. But we must beware of mistrusting Him to whom we owe our every blessing, because Babylon, the world-Church, has perverted His words. But if there were only two or three, there ought to be as much jealousy as if they were three thousand, to maintain publicly and privately, collectively and individually, ways consistent with the character of Christ. This cannot be unless there be discipline. The obligation of an united pure walk is lund up with the very integrity and being of Grod’s assembly. It ceases to be the Church of Cod, unless there be the holy, earnest, solemn carrying out of that which the Lord has laid down. “Purge out, therefore, the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened.” No ruin can touch this responsibility for a moment. On the other hand, the Lord takes care, in His grace, that blessing shall flow, spite of failure.

But there is more than the sovereign- action of olivine grace, where responsibility may have been little felt and the will of (rod misunderstood. The Lord watches over those gathered together to His name, and is there present, in their midst, were they but two or three. What unfailing and inestimable comfort! Conceive for a moment some Christian awakened to feel that the place of a believer is not to be a member merely of the ecclesiastical system of the country, or of particular views, but, on the contrary, that the only thing which suits and is due to Christ, is, that we should renounce — we cannot be too lowly, but neither can we be too thorough in renouncing — every tie that is not connected with Christ. Where we can obey Christ in the midst of those that are His — where the Holy Ghost is allowed freedom to work according to the word of God — there is Cod’s Church, and nowhere else. The liberty of the Spirit is to exalt Christ, and this only. This is a universal principle, true of an individual, and true of the assembly. It would be a miserable thing if the assembly were not a scene of true and blessed liberty; but such it is, that Cod may be glorified by Christ Jesus. There will be also the consciousness of that which is offensive, just in proportion to the spiritual power that is in the assembly.

A great or a small company makes no essential difference. The Holy Ghost is sent down to care for the interests of the name of Christ. The two or three weak and ignorant ones gathered to it at least know that they are His; that they ought not, therefore, to belong to man; that they ought not, therefore, to be under any other tie; that rules made by one, or many, or all — if they were the very best that were ever produced — are not entitled to bind Christians, seeing that God has already furnished the only perfect standard not only of faith, but of Church fellowship, and that to own another is to dishonour the word of God and the Holy Ghost, who is here to make it good in power. The question is not whether we can do better than others. God forbid. That, indeed, were presumption. But this I ask, whoever you may be (and I trust that, if you are a Christian, you will agree with me), Which is best, your rules or God’s word? If God, and not you, be the wiser, how came you to invent these rules? You thought the word of God insufficient, and you must supply the deficiency! What is the result? Take what is going on at the present moment, and in any society you like. The very newspapers ring with the scandal of what is done under the name of Christ. What do your rules avail? Neither you nor the wisest of men can construct a standard for all time; and why should it be attempted? God has given His own, and His children need no other.

We have already the only sure and divine rule. The only want is the faith to value and act upon it. True, the consequences are serious. Faithfulness to Christ costs much now as ever. But is it not a solemn thought that now, in this boasted nineteenth century after the Lord has accomplished redemption, we are only awakening, as it were, to feel that the word o*f God is better than the word of man? What a discovery! Yet it is great, as it is humbling that it should be a new thing; a discovery which many of the children of God have not yet made. All admit that God’s word is infinitely wise for the soul’s salvation. Who, when it is a question of eternal issues, would trust his soul to the doctrines of men? Then is felt the value of that word which reveals the Saviour, and of the blessed Spirit who makes the word precious in the revelation of Him. But is it not daring to draw these distinctions in the word of God, and put aside that which speaks of the Church, ministry, worship, the breaking of bread, and prayer? How comes it that men should behave practically as if God’s word had less decision and authority in these matters than the shifting thoughts of man? How comes it that men so seldom think of being guided only by the word of God? How comes it that believers resort as a matter of course to human ecclesiastical rules? How comes it, for example, that Dissenters, the best of them, when they want a minister in the word, proceed at once to elect him without a syllable of Scripture for that course? Who gave them licence to do so?

“It must be so; we have our own doctor and our own lawyer, and why not our own minister?” It is exactly this worldly principle that has done the mischief. Why is not God consulted in His word? How comes it that in Scripture a Church never elects a minister? Of course there must have been many who wanted ministerial help in those days as now; and God, who knew all that is good, must have known every want also. How comes it that there was never a man chosen by a Christian congregation to preach the gospel or teach the saints — not a solitary instance in the word of God? They cannot get rid of the difficulty. What are they to do? The fact is, the dissenting principle is broken at the very outset. They cannot step over the threshold. They cannot do without a minister, and they cannot elect a minister according to Scripture. Let us look now, not at Congregationalism, but at the two or three gathered to the name of Christ. They, too, want help, these feeble ones; and what are they to do? This is the word of their Lord, “Where two or three are gathered together unto my name, there am I in the midst of them.” God forbid that I should disparage the advantages of ministry; but to be simply subject to the Lord, whether or not He sends, is the best of all. The fact is, as we are not authorized, so we have no need, to elect any; for all are ours already, “whether Paul, Apollos, or Cephas.” It is for God to choose and give. He has bound up and made all His ministers part and parcel of the Church. They are members of Christ’s body. They are His gifts to the Church. It is ignorant and evil meddling for the Church to elect. Besides, the moment you elect one to be peculiarly your minister, by that very act you defraud yourselves of all the rest. You are going out of the path of God, in order to enrich yourselves in this respect; hut that very act of selfish haste, like every other departure from the path of faith, brings, as the necessary result, the surest impoverishment. Suppose, then, people get their minister; he may be but young, and they may want to be nourished and fed up in truth. Unless he have all the gifts centred in his single person, they are reduced to his individual measure. Another, again, may be a pastor, and love the saints; but the congregation consists, for the most party of persons needing to be converted, while he is not an evangelist, but a pastor, and perhaps a teacher. Howevident that, if tested thus practically, man’s ways always ruin God’s work! The parochial system in the established bodies works as much or more eviL It may seem natural and prudent, but human wisdom in divine things is as foolish as it is fatal.. What else could be expected, by those who know God and man, from a departure from the rich provision the Lord has made?

Let us now look on the other side. The Lord is there. The “two or three” do not exactly see their way. They are in presence of a great difficulty. Perhaps they have heard the whisper of some dreadful doctrine, and they do not understand it, not being versed in these matters. What then? They wait upon the Lord — a wholesome thing for any of us — most wholesome to be obliged to feel that the Lord alone can avail. But He does love and care for His saints. He raises up and sends, it may be, a servant of His. The latent evil is brought out plainly; and the moment the light of God, by whatever means, is oast upon it, the conscience of the saints answers to the call of the Lord, and they repudiate it heartily for themselves.

Again, there is one fallen into what may seem a ‘little evil, yet enough to render him indifferent to the •Lord, to His word, to His grace. He refuses to listen to the warning of one, then of more, and lastly, of the assembly of Grod. “Let him be unto thee as a heathen man.” He is not a heathen, but supposed to be a brother; yet he is treated as if he were a heathen, because he despises Christ in the Church. This in fact is the case here supposed (Matt, xviii). Such decision is trying to the heart, where will works among the saints. But it shows plainly that not their wisdom nor their experience guides aright, but the Lord in their midst; and He promises His presence if it were but to two or three gathered to His name. Here then we have a clear and positive provision for the faithful in the worst of times. It is hardly possible to conceive of circumstances where there might not be “” two or three.”

It is well, however, to add that the essential point is their gathering #to His name. It is not such a gathering unto Christ, where narrowness is allowed, or sectarianism, any more than in the grosser forms of letting in the world or tolerating evil. If any “two or three” were so happy together, as to look with suspicion on godly men outside them, they would forfeit their place of privilege, and be in a false position. Does the Lord so regard His disciples? Does He scrutinize them as if they were doubtful characters, or put them in quarantine as if the plague might be in them? I speak of saints where there is no suspicion of evil doctrine, direct or indirect, or of unholy walk. The Lord welcomes them, and so should we. His name has not its value where we are not large for His sake.

But there may be another case. A person comes, of great repute in the world, who has been preaching, and is universally respected; but alas ’ he betrays himself by a lack of heart and conscience where Christ is concerned. Him they refuse. Thus the same name of Christ, which is their warrant for welcoming the weakest that loves Him, is here exactly the same power for refusing the highest who does not love our Lord Jesus Christ in incorruption. What might is in that name to bring and keep together hearts otherwise alien, and yet withal what a delicate test for detecting and excluding what is not of God! If it be a question of truth, the name of the Lord is the only real touchstone; if it be a question of discipline, that name is strength to the. feeblest heart; if it be a question between persons and principle, there only is found all needed wisdom and power, both individually and as regards the assembly.

But let us look now at 2 Tim. ii. We have a picture drawn by the Holy Ghost of the professing body, the house of God. The first epistle duly cares for order and good government in the house of God. The second epistle anticipates the influx of evils to such an extent, that the house is merely alluded to as a comparison. Still “the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal,” — on one side, “The Lord knoweth them that are His,” and on the other, “Let every one that nameth the name of the Lord depart from iniquity.” There are thus the sovereignty of the Lord on one side, and just responsibility on the other — two great principles which meet us everywhere. Then follows a more detailed application: — “But in a great house there are not only vessels of gold and of silver, but also of wood and of earth, and some to honour and some to dishonour.” Some would take the place of knowing the Lord whom He did not own, and who felt not the incongruity of His name with iniquity. Timothy must be prepared for the development of evil among those that confess Christ — not only “some to honour” but “some to dishonour.” “If a man therefore piu*ge himself from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour, sanctified and meet for the Master’s use, and prepared unto every good work.” Separation from evil is the invariable principle of God, modified as to the manner, of course, by the special character of the dispensation. So Isaiah, Jeremiah and the prophets generally. Is Christianity less stringent? It is now, on the contrary, that it becomes more urgent and absolute. “If a man purge himself from these [the vessels to dishonour], he shall be a vessel to honour.” Put away the wicked (1 Cor. v.); if this be no longer possible, purge yourself out from them. There is nothing man dreads and feels so deeply. You may protest, you may denounce, and it will be borne by the world as long as you walk with it in the main; but “he that departeth,” now, as ever, “maketh himself a prey.” Act on your convictions, and the most honeyed courtesy turns sour; your desire to please (rod at all cost will be branded as Pharisaical pride and exclusiveness. It matters not how gently and lovingly you purge yourself from the vessels to dishonour; the pain, the grievance lies there, and nothing can sweeten it, above all in the eyes of those it condemns. Indeed it is more felt, the more graciously it is done, provided it be done thoroughly; for then, evidently, your motive is not disappointed feeling, but desire to be wholly subject to Christ, with a heart perfectly happy in what they know nothing of and could not enjoy.

All this is an unpardonable affront in the world’s eyes. Add to this, that separation is claimed, in 2 Tim., frftm the religious or Christian world. “The Christian world!” what a phrase! what a contradiction! as if there could be the smallest possible alliance between Christianity, which is of heaven and Christ, and that outside world which crucified Him. No wonder that in this epistle we read of perilous times in the last days. What greater peril than, after they have known the truth, going back into the substantially same conditions of evil as were found in the heathen world before Christianity entered it. Compare 2 Tim. iii. with Rom. i. How painful the resemblance! The difference is, that some of the grosser characteristics of heathenism have been replaced by subtler evil. The comparison is most instructive. In this state of things, the Christian profession is indeed a great house; and, as in such a house, there is that which is destined to the basest uses, no less than what is for the best purposes, so in that great house which bears the name of Christ — if you please, “the Christian world”

If there, what ought you to do? It is a solemn question for the believer. He has no hesitation about the profane world; but the world bearing the name of Christ is a difficulty to him. Seeing that the Christian profession is there, am I not setting myself up and virtually condemning the excellent of the earth? But will you name any evil thing that has not had a good name attached to it? I do not speak now of such fatal poison as Socinianism or the like; but take Romanism, or the Greek Church, or even sects known to be heretical, and yet, by the malice of the enemy and the subtlety with* which he has concealed his work, some children of Grod have been entangled. It is too plain, therefore, that, whatever good men may do here or there, the only real inquiry is as to the will of the Lord. It is not a question of making others walk in your light, but you must not walk in their darkness. This is the great point, not occupying ourselves with others, prescribing what they must do, but feeling my own sin, as well as the common sin, yet by grace resolved at all costs to be where I can honour and obey the Lord.

Is this not a true, plain, imperative duty, an undeniable principle of Scripture, that commends itself to your conscience? It may be that you do not act accordingly; but you cannot deny that it is a right thing, and what you ought to do.

But you are tied, and have difficulties. Perhaps you have a family and friends you cannot bear to grieve; perhaps you have hopes for your children, if not for yourself. Can a heart purified by faith thus set aside the Lord’s word? Do you think He does not know your wants, and does not feel for your family? You know the Lord loves yourself; cannot you trust Him for a bit of bread? You, who are trusting Him for eternal life and for heaven, cannot you trust Him to take care of you in the face of these trials and obstacles of every day? Perhaps you are too comfortable, too anxious about what is respectable for yourself and your children. Let the Lord deal with you; I am sure He will not harm you, but only do what is most loving and tender towards you and yours. Impossible for any heart to be beyond the Lord’s love, and wisdom, and generous, considerate care. If you really believe in Him, why not cleave to His word without compact or condition, and come forth at His bidding? You do not know what the next steps may be. It is enough that you know you are doing contrary to the word of Grod now. In vain we talk of loving, if we are not prepared to follow His word. Do you say you do not know what next to do? The Lord does not ask you; it is not His way to show all at once. Act on what you see from the word, and trust the Lord for what will follow. He is worthy of your confidence, and will give you more when you have taken the first step. But leave for ever that which is condemned in God’s word. “Eememher Lot’s wife,” and look not hack, hut go forth at His word wherever it points, and you will find that “whosoever hath, to him shall he given.” And as regards the way, to the Lord, rough or smooth, is alike, deep or shallow, great or small; it may make a great difference to you, hut the greatest difficulties only become the means of proving what the Grod is that we have found.

But there is more in 2 Tim. ii. Not only are you to separate, or purge yourself, from these vessels of dishonour, hut the word is, “Flee also youthful lusts, hut follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart.” Thus there is no excuse for isolation. Turn your hack upon what you know is opposed to Scripture. Have I to demonstrate to any Christian that what is unscriptural is unholy? Have I to urge that “to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin?” If, then, you abandon what has no warrant from Scripture, hut, on the contrary, is condemned by it, hear this word of Grod: “Follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace.” Follow them, not solitarily, hut “with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart.” What consolation, even if there were hut two or three! Are you afraid because there are only two or three? Grod may act on hundreds or thousands: this is a matter for Him. You are to follow the Lord’s path through His word, with chastened spirit yet not sadly, but full of joy and thankfulness, if you find ever so few who call upon the Lord out of a pure heart. In other words, faith has a divine warrant to expect companions in its path, though it lie now through the ruins of the Christian profession. As it is imperative to turn away from all known evil, and there can be no valid excuse for refusing God’s call, so there is enjoined companionship in following after righteousness, faith, charity, and peace, with such as call upon the Lord out of a pure heart. May no hindrances nor dangers alarm, but, knowing that it is the Lord who has thus graciously thought of us, may you and I, and every one that loves that blessed name, have unbroken confidence in Him! He addresses Himself to hearts grieved in the midst of dishonour to His grace and truth, and He has taken care to mark most distinctly the path, not of separation only, but of association; the path of departure from evil, and of piu,suing what is good. How clearly the great moral principles of Grod remain in spite of disorder! How the operations of His grace survive all ruin! Thus, the principle of the assembly of Grod abides in, it may be, only two or three, gathered to the name of the Lord. Thousands of Christians, in a national system or in a dissenting sect, could not redeem their fundamental error; members of Christ may be in them, but the principle of Grod’s assembly is abandoned in their very constitution. Let “two or three” come out at the word of the Lord, making His name their centre, and owning the Spirit of Grod as in and with them to guide them according to Scripture; these, and these only, are carrying out His mind in the real intelligence of the Holy Grhost. It is no question of numbers, but of being gathered together, few or many, unto the name of the Lord.

All here know what the House of Commons is. A hundred members of that House might belong to the United Service Club, or the Athenaeum, or anything else you please. These hundred members might discuss the measures actually before the House in their club; but this could never make the club to be the House; whereas, in their true position, with the Speaker in the midst, a much less number would constitute a House. It is exactly the same principle here, What constitutes Grod’s assembly? “Two or three” gathered to the Lord’s name. He has been pleased to bring it down to the point described, with the fullest possible stamp of His approval and authority.

On the other hand, suppose ten thousand Christians meeting simply as Christians — is that enough? I can conceive an assembly of professing, yea, real Christians; and yet there would be no more reason to call them Grod’s assembly, than to consider any number of members at their club the House of Commons. It is not the fact of being Christians that constitutes Grod’s assembly, but their being gathered unto the name of the Lord. The true difference is, whether we are gathered to the name of Christians merely, or to the name of Christ. If the former?

you must accept of any evil thing into which the enemy succeeds in dragging Christians. For if the man be a Christian, I must receive him, spite of evil he is doing or sanctioning. But no! the question is, Does he call upon the Lord out of a pure heart? The exclusion of this word of (rod has widely overrun Christendom, to the incalculable injury of souls, and never more than now, when men practically put Christians in lieu of Christ, the consequence of which is confusion and every evil work.

Whereas, if the Lord have His place, and be the centre to which I come, I have then, in His name, a ground and rallying point to which I can claim, with the most entire humility, every saint in the world — yea, I could not and ought not to rest in my spirit as long as there is outside one that belongs to Him. What! even those under discipline, or avoided for grave causes? Yes, every one; not, of course, to receive them with known evil upon them, but yet to desire themselves, what is contrary to Christ being judged and removed.

The Lord make us steadfast, and give us to feel that the lowliest spirit becomes us! How can we boast of ceasing to do evil we ourselves have done? May we look to Him increasingly! He who has brought us out has compelled us to prove by our own difficulties the true state of the Church; but He has turned to profit our very mistakes, though in a hiunbling way. He has used the storm, as it were, to purge the hazy air, and displayed more clearly than ever the central place of His own name for our gathering together, no less than our salvation.

Thus, we may leave all fears and anxieties. If the Lord be our helper, why fear? What will man do? — Then, as for charges of sectarianism, presumption, or disorder, it were easy indeed to show that those are really guilty who are quick to raise and scatter them. We know that Scripture condemns every church association that is not based on and governed by the name of Christ. It is not a mere question of wrongs here or there; but are they Christians gathered to the name of Christ? Neither is it a question of the amount of evil; for what did not slip in at Corinth through ignorance and unwatchfulness? The refusal to judge known evil is no doubt fatal. But supposing the absence of everything gross, the true question is, Are we where the Lord would have us be? Then happy are we, if but “two or three thus:” were we ten millions anywhere else, all must be wrong, because Christ is not the acknowledged and exclusive centre ecclesiastically. He who is the only adequate and rightful object for all the saints on earth, deigns to be the centre of but “two or three,” as He says, that are “gathered together unto His name.”

Date Due

MY18’53

I 131996”