The Church in Earnest

Last year I ventured to publish a little work, entitled, ‘¢ An Earnest Ministry the Want of the Times.” Most of the Reviews which did me the honor of criticising it characterized and recommended it as a practical work. Whether this were intended in the way of depreciation or information, it most aptly describes the production, which contains no profound disquisition — no new views — no development of abstract principles, and which pretends to nothing more than a humble effort, made in love, to stir up the pure minds of my brethren, by way of remembrance, and to furnish a few practical directions to beginners in the ministry.

Every one who writes to do good, and who yields to the impulse which says to him, “Do something; do it;” should well consider, not only what he would do, but what he can do; should study, not only his obligations, but his talents, his opportunities, and his means. It was a wise plan of action which the Psalmist laid down for himself, when he said, “‘ Neither do I exercise myself in things too high for me.” On this rule I have uniformly endeavored to act, in all my attempts at authorship. If I have any talent for usefulness, it is essentially a practical one. I will not conceal that I have been sometimes almost tempted to envy those who possess greater power of abstract thinking. This is a noble faculty, and the men to whom it is given perform services for truth which are invaluable, and, indeed, indisnsable; they explain its nature — unfold its beauty —

efend it against the attacks of error — and establish principles to be applied by those who could neither so clearly discover, nor so ably sustain them. Practical men, however, are as useful in their place as ingenious and contemplative ones; and if their department be a more humble, yet it is not a less necessary, one, than that of theorists, philosophers, and logicians. There must be the hands to work the engine, as well as the mind to invent it.

In the exercise of this my vocation, I now send forth another work, no less practical than the one which immediately preceded it, or than several others, the products of my

n. The publication of the volume on “An Earnest Ministry,” brought to me many and urgent applications for a similar one, addressed to the Churches. en I considered these appeals, I foresaw, what I have since experienced, the difficulty of keeping clear, in this work, of some of the topics involved in the subject of its predecessor. That difficulty I have not been able altogether to avoid. The earnestness of the ministry, and the earnestness of the people, in reference to the same great object, are, on so many points, coincident, that it was neither possible, if it had been desirable, nor desirable, had it been possible, to avoid the repetition of some views and counsels common to both. Yet, even after this expianation, I anticipate a complaint that several portions of this work are but a republication of some portions of the other. I cannot altogether deny the charge, and can only observe, in addition to what has been already just Stated, that as the volumes are intended for two different classes of persons, comparatively few will read both; and that, though in some places the same topics are taken u the discussion and the illustrations are considerably varied.

To the publication of this work I have been stimulated by an able critique in the “British Quarterly Review,” for February last, entitled, “The Christian Ministry, and how to mend it.” In that essay occurs the following remark, ‘“‘ We confess, however, that we have been prompted, in great part, to the writing of this paper, by a fear, lest, while the responsibilities of the pulpit are discussed, those of the pew should be forgotten; for assuredly while an earnest ministry - May conduce to an earnest church, it is only as we possess both, we shall possess an earnest and powerful Christianity.”

To the wisdom, truth, and importance of this momentous paragraph, I most heartily subscribe, and in the hope of

romoting the union and harmony which it recommends, ve addressed this volume to thé occupant of the pew, as

I did the former to the occupant of the pulpit. Earnestness is equally the duty of both, and so close is the sympathy between them, that it is almost impossible for the one to be, or to continue long, in a state of full devotedness, if the other be not in a similar condition. Even the serapbic ardor of a minister who is as a flame of fire, will soon be in danger

of cooling down to the lukewarmness of the flock, if his efforts are unsuccessful in raising their spiritual temperature to his own.

It is more than probable that some persons will be of opinion that I underestimate the piety of the present generation of professors, and the sptritual condition of the church — that I have written in too desponding a tone — and that in adverting to defects and imperfections, I have not done justice to acknowledged excellences. In reply, I observe, that my object is not so much to compare the piety of the age with that of any antecedent one, which is an extremely difficult attempt, as with the standard set up in the Word of God, for all times, and for all states of society. I have followed, what appears to me to be, the precedents of our Lord’s addresses to the seven churches in Asia, and the apostolical epistles to the primitive churches; in which, while the good is acknowledged and commended, the evil also, is disclosed and condemned. How much of complaint, expostulation, and reproof, do we find in these solemn and faithful appeals to the churches of those days! A weak and foolish love, which sees no fault in the object of its blind affection, deals only in flattery and caresses; while a judicious regard, which is jealous for the honor of its object, and wishes to advance it to perfection, is in danger of being too impatient under a sense of its defects.

Some of my readers will also accuse me of magnifying the dangers to which the evangelical system is likely to be exposed in this and the coming age, from popery, infidelity, and false philosophy. In this I have acted upon the truth of the proverb, that “to be forewarned is to be forearmed.” The man who, in such an age as this, folds his arms, closes his eyes, falls back in his chair, and lulls himself to sleep, with the easy consciousness that there is no need of alarm, vigilance, and caution, must have powers of observation, or methods of calculation, very different from mine. Recent events, I know, it is said, are most inauspicious for popery. Be it so: but do we imagine that it is dead? Have we forgotten how it recovered from a deeper, and seemingly more

eadly wound, inflicted upon it by the first revolution of France? Moreover, is it lost sight of, that though it should be destroyed as a temporal power, and should be left by all secular governments to take care of itself, its spiritual poteney to fascinate and to seduce men still remains? 1*

Keep reading