TheWayLIBRARY

TheWay Library › The Home Beautiful › Chapter XIV: Being Christians on Weekdays

by J. R. Miller

Chapter XIV

Being Christians on Weekdays

How to carry our religion into all parts of our life is the question which perplexes many of us. It is not hard to be good on the quiet Sabbaths, when all the holy influences of the sanctuary and of the Christian home are about us. It is not hard, in such an atmosphere, to think of God, and to yield ourselves to the impact of the divine Spirit. It is easy then to accept the promises and allow them to twine themselves about our weakness, like a mother’s arms about feeble infancy. Most of us have little trouble with doubts and fears or with temptations and trials while sitting in the peaceful retreats into which the Sabbath leads us.

Oiu: trouble is in canying this sweet, holy, restful life out into the weekday world of toil, anxiety, strife and pain. Of ttimes with Monday morning we lose all the Sabbath calm and resume again the old experience of restless distraction. The restraints of godliness lose their power, and the enthusiasm for holy living, so strong yesterday, dies out in the midst of the world’s chilling influences, and we drop back into the old habitudes and creep along again in the old dusty ways.

The Sabbath has lifted us up for a day, but has not power to hold us up in sustained elevation of soul. The duties we saw so clearly and so firmly determined to do while sitting in the sanctuary we do not feel pressing upon us to-day with half the lurgency of yesterday. Our high resolves and our excellent intentions have proved only like the morning cloud and the early dew; so om: religion becomes a sort of luxury to us — a bright imreal dream only which for one day in seven breaks into the worldliness and the self-seeking of oiu: hiundnmi lives, giving us a period of elevation, but no permanent uplifting. It is only as when one climbs up out of a valley into the pure air of a moimtain top for one hour, and then creeps down again and toils on as before amid the mists and in the deep shadows, but carrying none of the moimtain’s inspiration or of the mountain’s splendor with him back into the valley.

Yet such a life has missed altogether the meaning of the religion of Christ, which is not designed to furnish merely a system of Sabbath oases across the desert of life, with nothing between but sand and glare. Both its precepts and its blessings are for all the days. He who worships God only on Sabbaths, and then ignores him or disobeys him on weekdays, really has no true religion. We are perpetually in danger of bisecting our life, calling one portion of it religious and the other secular. Yoimg people, when they enter the Church, are earnestly urged to Christian duty, and the impression made

CHRISTIANS ON WEEKDAYS

upon them is that Christian duty means reading the Bible and pra3dng every day, attending upon the public means of grace, taking active part in some of the associations, missionary or charitable, which belong to the Church, and in private and personal ways striving to bring others to Christ.

Now, important as these things are, they are by no means all the religious duties of any young Christian, and it is most fallacious teaching that emphasizes them as though they were all.

Religion recognizes no bisecting into sacred and secular. “Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God.” It is just as much a part of Christian duty to do one’s weekday work well as it is to pray well. “I must be about my Father’s business,” said Jesus in the dawn of youth; and what do we find him doing after this recognition of his duty? Not preaching nor teaching, but taking up the common duties of common life and putting all his soul into them. He foimd the Father’s business in his earthly home, in being a dutiful child subject to his parents, in being a diligent pupil in the village school and later in being a conscientious carpenter. He did not find religion too spiritual, too transcendental, for weekdays. His devotion to God did not take him out of his natmral human relationships into any realm of mere sentiment: it only made him all the more loyal to the duties of his place in life.

We ought to learn the lesson. Religion is intensely

practical. Only so far as it dominates one’s life is it real. We must get the commandments down from the Sinaitic glory amid which they were first graven on stone by the finger of God and give them a place in the hard, dusty paths of earthly toil and struggle. We must get them off the tables of stone and have them written on the walls of om: ovm hearts. We must bring the Golden Rule down from its bright setting in the teaching of our Lord and get it wrought into our daily, actual life.

We say in creed, confession and prayer that we love God, and he tells us, if we do, to show it by loving our fellow men, siQce professed love to God which is not thus manifested is not love at all. We talk about our consecration; if there is anything genuine in consecration, it bends our wills to God’s, it leads us to loyalty that costs, it draws our lives to lowly ministry. “One secret act of self-denial,” says a thoughtful writer, “one sacrifice of inclination to duty, is worth all the mere good thoughts, warm feelings, passionate prayers, in which idle people indulge themselves.”

“Faith’s meanest deed more favor bears
Where hearts and wills are weighed
Than brightest transports, choicest prayers,
Which bloom their hour and fade.”

We are too apt to imagine that holiness consists in mere good feeling toward God. It does not: it consists in obedience in heart and life to the divine requirements. To be holy is, first, to be set apart

CHRISTIANS ON WEEKDAYS

for God and devoted to God’s service: “The Lord hath set apart him that is godly for himself”; but if we are set apart for God in this sense, it necessarily follows that we must live for God. We belong wholly to him, and any use of our life in any other service is sacrilege, as if one would rob the very altar of its smoking sacrifice to gratify one’s common himger. Our hands are God’s, and can fitly be used only in doing his work; our feet are God’s, and may be employed only in walking in his ways and running his errands; our lips are God’s, and should speak words only that honor him and bless others; our hearts are God’s, and must not be profaned by thoughts and affections that are not pure.

Ideal holiness is no vague sentiment: it is intensely practical. It is nothing less than the bringing of every thought and feeling and act into obedience to Christ. We are quite in danger of leaving out the element of obedience in our conception of Christian living. If we do this, our religion loses its strength and grandeur and becomes weak, nerveless and forceless. As one has said, “Let us be careful how we cull from the gospel such portions as are congenial, forge God’s signatiure to the excerpt and apply the fiction as a delusive anod3me to our violated consciences. The beauties and graces of the gospel are all flimg upon a background of requirements as inflexible as Sinai and the granite. Christ built even his glory out of obedience.”

Now, it is the weekday life, under the stress and the strain of temptation, far more than the Sunday life, beneath the gentle warmth of its favoring conditions, that really puts our religion to the test and shows what power the is in it. Not how well we sing and pray nor how devoutly we worship on the Lord’s day, but how well we Kve, how loyally we obey the commandments, how faithfully we attend to all our duties, on the other days, tell what manner of Christians we really are.

Nor can we be faithful toward God and ignore our human relationships. ^’It is impossible,” says one, “for us to live in fellowship with God without holiness in all the duties of life. These things act and react on each other. Without a diligent and faithful obedience to the calls and claims of others upon us, our religious profession is simply dead. We cannot go from strife, breaches and angry words to God. Selfishness, an imperious will, want of sympathy with the sufferings and sorrows of other men, neglect of charitable offices, suspicions, hard censures of those with whom our lot is cast, will miserably darken our own hearts and hide the face of God from us.”

The one word which defines and describes all relative duties is the word love. Many people xmderstand religion to include honesty, truthfulness, justice, purity, but do not think of it as including just as peremptorily imselfishness, thoughtfulness, kindness, patience, good temper and courtesy. We are conmianded to put away lying, but in the same

CHRISTIANS ON WEEKDAYS

paragraph, and with equal urgency, we are enjoined to let all bitterness, wrath, anger, clamor and evil-speaking be put away, and to be kind one to another, tender-hearted, forgiving one another. The law of love in all its most delicate shades of application to spirit, word, act and manner is the law of all true Christian living.

Thus the religion of the Sabbath, like a precious perfume, must pervade all the days of the week. Its spirit of holiness and revcfirence must flow down into all the paths of everyday life. Its voices of hope and joy must become inspirations in all our cares and toils. Its exhortations must be the guide of hand and foot and finger in the midst of all trial and temptation. Its words of comfort must be as lamps to bum and shine in sick rooms and in the chambers of sorrow. Its visions of spiritual beauty must be translated into reality in conduct and character.

So, in all our life, the Sabbath’s lessons must be lived out during the week; the patterns of heavenly things shown in the mount must be wrought into forms of reality and act and disposition and character. The love of God which so warms our hearts as we think of it must flow out in love to men. We must be Christians on Monday as well as on the Sabbath. Our religion must touch every part of our life and transform it all into the beauty of holiness.

Open in the readerThe Home Beautiful

Restored from a scan of the 1912 edition, with page headers and numbers removed and words rejoined across line breaks. Scan-derived text, still being proofread; compare the original scan before quoting.