Words to Winners of Souls

OW MUCH MORE WOULD A FEW GOOD AND FERVENT MEN EFFECT IN THE MINISTRY THAN A MULTITUDE OF LUKEWARM ONES!” Such was the remark of Cicolampadius, the Swiss Reformer, — a man who had been taught by experience, and who has recorded that experience for the benefit of other churches and other days. It is a remark, however, the truth of which has been but little acknowledged and acted on; nay, whose importance is to this day unappreciated even where its truth is not denied. The mere multiplying of men calling themselves ministers of Christ, will avail: little. They may be but “cumberers of the ground.” They may be like Achans, troubling the camp; or perhaps Jonahs, raising the tempest. Even when sound in the faith, yet, through unbelief, lukewarmness, and slothful formality, they may do irreparable injury to the cause of Christ; freezing and withering up all spiritual life around them. The lukewarm ministry of one who is theoretically orthodox, is often more extensively and fatally ruinous to souls than that of one grossly inconsistent or flagrantly heretical. ‘‘ What man on earth is so pernicious a drone as an idle minister?” said Cecil. And Fletcher remarked well, that “lukewarm pastors made careless Christians.” Can the multiplication of such ministers, to whatever amount, ‘be counted a blessing to a people? The fathers of the Scottish Church, acting upon this principle, preferred keeping a parish ‘vacant to appointing over it an unsuitable pastor. And when the church of Christ, in all her denominations, returns to primitive example, and, walking in apostolical footsteps, seeks to be conformed more closely to inspired models, allowing nothing that pertains to earth to come between her and her living Head, then will she give more careful heed to see that the men to whom she. intrusts the care of souls, however learned and able, should be yet more distinguished by their — and zeal and faith and love.

In comparing Baxter and Orton together, the biographer of the former remarks that Baxter would have set the world on fire while Orton was lighting a match.” How true! Yet not true alone of Baxter or of Orton. These two individuals are representations of two classes in the church of Christ in every age, and of every denomination. The latter class are far the more numerous; thé Ortons you may count bys hundreds, the Baxters by tens; yet who would not prefer a solitary specimen of the one to a thousand of the other? “When he spoke of weighty soul concerns,” says one of his contemporaries of Baxter, “‘ you might find his very spirit drenched therein.” 4 No wonder that he was blessed with such amazing success! Men felt that in listening to him they were in contact with one who was dealing with realities, and these of infinite moment.

This is one of the secrets of ministerial strength and ministerial success. And who can say how much of the overflowing infidelity of the present day is owing not only to the lack of spiritual instructors, — not merely to the existence of grossly unfaithful and inconsistent ones, — but to the coldness of many who are reputed sound and faithful. Men can not but feel that if religion is worth anything, it is worth everything;

1 Sylvester’s Funeral Sermon for Baxter. ‘that if it calls for any measure of zeal and warmth, it will justify the utmost degrees of these; and that there is no consistent medium between reckless atheism and the intensest warmth of religious zeal. Men may dislike, detest, scoff at, persecute the latter, yet their consciences are all the while silently reminding them that, if there be a God and a Saviour, a heaven and a hell, anything short of such life and love is hypocrisy, dishonesty, perjury! And thus the lesson they learn from the lifeless discourses of the class we are alluding ‘to, is, that as the men do not believe the doctrines they are preaching, there is no need for their hearers believing them; if ministers only believe them because they make their living by them, why should those who make nothing by them scruple about denying them? The inconsistencies of the popish priesthood have made Italy a land of infidels; and ought we not to search ourselves.

and see how much of modern infidelity may be traced to the indolence, the coldness, the cold orthodoxy of the Protestant ministry at home? “Rash preaching,” said Rowland Hill, “disgusts; timid preaching leaves poor souls fast asleep; bold preaching is the onlypreaching that is owned of God.”

It is not merely unsoundness in faith, nor negligence in duty, nor open inconsistency of life that mars the ministerial work and ruins souls.. A man may be free from — all scandal either in creed or conduct, and yet may be a most grievous obstruction in the way of all spiritual good to his people. He may be a dry and empty cistern, notwithstanding his orthodoxy. He may be freezing up or blasting life, at the very time that he is speaking of the way of life. He may be repelling men from the cross even when he is in words proclaiming it. He~ may be standing between his flock and the blessing -even when he is, in outward form,

lifting up his hands to bless them. “The same words that from warm lips would drop as the rain, or distill as the dew, fall from his lips as the snow or hail, chilling all

- spiritual warmth, and blighting all spiritual

life. How many souls have been lost for want of earnestness, want of solemnity, want of love in the preacher, even when the words uttered were precious and true!

We take for granted that the object of

the Christian ministry is to convert sinners

and to edify the body of Christ. No faithful minister can possibly rest short of this. Applause, fame, popularity, honor, wealth — all these are vain. Ifsouls are not won, if saints are not matured, our ministry itself is vain. The question, therefore, which each of us has to answer to his own conscience is, “Has it been the end of my ministry, has it been the desire of my heart

to save the lost and guide the saved Is this my aim in every sermon I preach, in every visit I pay? Is it under the influence of this feeling that I continually live and walk and speak? Is it for’this I pray and toil and fast and weep? Is it for this I spend and am spent, counting it, next to the salvation of my own soul, my chiefest joy to be the instrument of saving others? Is it for this that I exist? and to accomplish this would I gladly die? Have I seen the pleasure of the Lord prospering in my hand? Have I seen souls converted under my ministry? Have God’s people found refreshment from my lips, and gone upon their way rejoicing? or have I seen no fruit of my labors, and yet am I content to remain unblest? Am I satisfied to preach, and yet not know of one saving impression made, one sinner awakened? Can I go contentedly through the routine of ministerial labor, and never think of asking how God is prospering the work of my hands and the words of my lips?”

Keep reading