Adam’s Sin

Quest. XV. WHAT was the sin tcherclnj our first parents fell from the estate wherein they irere created?

Ans. The sin was their eating the forbidden fruit: Gen. iii. C, “She took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also to her husband.”

Here is implied, l.s. That our first parcTits fell from their estate of innocency. 2(f. The sin by which they fell, eating the forbidden fruit.

1st. Our first parents fell from their gh)- rious state of innocency: Eccl. vii. 29.. “God made man upright, but they have sought out many inventions.” Adam was perefectly holy, — he had rectitude of mind, and liberty of will to good, — but his head ached till he had invented his own and our death, — he sought out many inventions, 1. Adam’s fall was voluntary; he had a possf non peccare, — a power not to fall. Free-will was a sufficient shield to repel temptation; the devil could not have forced him, unless he had given his consent. Satan was only a suitor to woo, not a king to compel: but Adam gave away his own power, and suffered himself to be decoved into sin, like a young gallant, who, at one throw, loseth a fair lordship. Adam had a fair lordship, he was lord of the world. Gen. i. 28., “Have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth.” But he lost all at one throw. As soon as he sinned, he forfeited paradise. — 2. Adam’s fall was sudden, he did not long continue in his royal majesty.

Quest. How long did Adam continue in paradise before he fell?

Alts. Tostatus saith, he fell the next day. Pererius saith, he fell the eighth day after his creation. But the most probable and received opijiion is, that Adam fell the very same day in which he was created: So IrenjEus, Cyril, Epiphanius, and many others. The reasons which incline me to believe so, are,

1. It is said, Satan was a murderer ’ from the beginning,’ John viii. 44 Now, whom

did he murder? Not the blessed angels, he could not reach them; nor the cursed angels, for they had before destroyed themselves. How then was Satan a murderer from the beginning? As soon as Satan fell, he began to tempt mankind to sin; this was a murdering temptatiofi. By which it appears Adam did not stay long in ])aradise, soon after his creation the Movil set upon him, and murdered him by his temptation.

2. Argument to prove that Adam fell the same day he was created: Adam had not yet eaten of the tree of life, (ien. iii. 22, 23., “And now lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever; the Lord sent him forth from the garden.” This tree of lif(», being one of the choicest fruits in the garden, and being placed in the midst of paradise, it is very like Adam would have eaten of this tree of life one of the first, had not the serpent beguiled him with the tree of knowledge. So that hence I conclude, Adam fell the very day of his creation, because he had not yet tasted the tree of life, that tree that was most in his eye, and had such delicious fruit growing upon it.

3. Argument from Ps. xlix. 12., “INIan being in honour, ahideth not” The Rabbins read it thus, ‘Adam being in honour, lodged not one night.’ The Hebrew word for abide, signifies, ’ to stay or lodge all night.’ Adam then, it seems, did not take up one night’s lodging in Paradise.

Inference. From Adam’s sudden fall, he fell the same day in which he was creat(!d, learn: 1. The weakness of human nature. Adam in a state of integrity, quickly made a defection from God, he soon lost the robe of innocency, and the glory of Paradise. And, was our nature thus weak when it was at the best, what is it now when it is at the worst? If Adam did not stand when he was perfectly righteous, how una])le are we to stand when sin hath cut the lock of our original righteousness? If purified nature did not stand, how then shall corrupt nature? If Adam, in a few hours, sinned

ADAM’S SIN

himself out of Paradise, how quickly would we sin ourselves into hell, if we were not kept by a greater power than our own! But God puts underneath his everlasting arms, Deut. xxxii. 17. — 2. From Adam’s fiuddcn fall, he fell the same day; learn how sad it is for a man to be left to himself. (1) Adam being left to himself, fell: O then, what will become of us, how soon fall, if God leave us to ourselves! A man without God’s grace, left to himself, is like a ship in a storm, without pilot or anchor, and is ready to dash upon every rock. Make this prayer to God, “Lord, do not leave me to myself: If Adam fell so soon who had strength, how soon shall I fall who have no strength!” O urge God with his hand and seal, 2 Cor. xii. 9., “My strength shall be made perfect in weakness.”

2d. The sin by which our first parents fell was ’ eating the forbidden fruit;’ where, consider two things: I. The occasion of it. II. The sin itself.

I. The occasion of it; the serpent’s temptation. The devil did creep into the serpent, and spake in the serpent, as the angel in Balaam’s ass; where, consider,

1st. The subtlety of Satan’s temptation; his wiles are worse than his darts. Satan’s subtlety in tempting: (1.) He deals all along as an impostor, he ushered in his temptation by a lie. Gen. iii. 4., “Ye shall not surely die.” 2d. Lie, That God did envy our first parents their happiness, v. 5., “God knows, that in the day ye eat, your eyes shall be opened;” q. d. It is God’s envying your felicity; that he forbids you this tree. 3d. Lie, That they should be thereby made like unto God, v. 5., “Ye shall be as gods.” Here was his subtlety in temj)ting: The devil was first a li.ar, then a murderer.

(2.) In that he set upon our first parents so quickly, before they were confirmed in their obedience; the angels in heaven are fully confirmed in holiness, — they are called ’ stars of the morning,’ Job xxxviii. 7., and they are fixed stars. But our first parents were not confirmed in their obedience, — they were not fixed in their orb of holiness; though they had a possibility of standing, they had not an impossibility of falling:

they were holy, but mutable; here was Satan’s subtlety, in tempting our first parents before they were confirmed in their obedience.

(3.) His subtlety in tempting was, That he set upon Eve first; 1. Because he thought she was less able to resist. Satan did break over the hedge, where it was weakest; he knew he couhl more easily insinuate and wind himself into her by a temptation. An expert soldier, when he is to storm or entei a castle, observes warily where there is a breach, or how he may enter with more facility; so did Satan the weaker vessel. 2. He tempted Eve first, because he knew, if once he could prevail with her, she would easily draw her husband. Thus the devil handed over a temptation to Job by his wife. Job ii. 9., “Curse God and di(^” Agrij)pina poisoned the emperor Conimodus with wine in a perfumed cup: the cup being perfumed and given him by his wife, it was the less suspected. Satan knew a temptation coming to Adam from his wife, would be more prevailing, and would be less suspected: O bitter! Sometimes relations prove temptations: a wife may be a snare, when she dissuades her husband from doing his duty, or enticeth him to evil. “Ahab which did sell himself to work wickedness, whom his wife Jezebel stirred up,” 1 Kings xxi. 25. She blew the coals and made his sin flame out the more. Satan’s subtlety was in tempting Adam by his wife, he thought she would draw him to sin.

(i.) Satan’s subtlety in tempting, was in assaulting Eve’s faith; he would persuade her that God had not spoken truth, “Ye shall not surely die,” Gen. iii. 4. This was Satan’s master-piece, to weaken her faith: when he had shaken that, and had brought her once to distrust; then ’ she yielded,’ — she presently put forth her hand to evil.

2dly. Satan’s cruelty in tempting: as soon as Adam was invested in all his glory, the devil cruelly, as it were on the day of Adaui’s coronation, would dethrone him, and bring forth him and all his posterity under a curse. We see how little love SatJin hath to mankind; he hath an implacable antipathy agtiinst us, and antipathies can never be reconciled. So much for the occasion of Adam’s sin, tempted by the serpent.

II. The sin itself, * Eating the forbidden fruit.’ This was very heinous, and that appears three ways: 1. In respect of the person that committed it. 2. The aggravation of the sio. 3. The drcadfidness of the effect.

1*^. Very heinous in respect of the person that committed it: Adam had excellent and noble endowments; he was illuminated with knowledge, — embellished with holiness, — he knew his duty, and it was as easy to him to obey God’s command as to know it, — he might have chosen whether he would sin or no, — yet he wilfully did eat of the tree which he was forbidden.

2dly. The aggravation of Adam’s sin.

Quest. Wherein did it appear to be so great? ‘Ticas but raptus pomi, teas this such a great matter to pluck an apple?

Ans. Besides that, it was against an infinite God; it was malum complexion, — a voluminous sin, — there were many twisted together in it, as Cicero saith of parricide, “he who is guilty of it, pturima committit peccata in uno, commits many sins in one;” so there were many sins in this one sin of Adam. A big-bellied sin, a chain with many links. Ten sins in it.

1. Incredulity. Our first parents did not believe what God had spoken was truth. God said. They shall die the death, in the day they eat of that tree. They believed not that they should die; they could not be persuaded that such fair fruit had death at the door. Thus, by unbelief they made God a liar; nay, which was worse, they believed the devil rather than God.

2. Un thankfulness, which is the epitome of all sin. Adam’s sin was committed in the midst of Paradise. God had enriched him with variety of mercies; he had stamped his own image upon him; lie had made him lord of the world, gave him of all the trees of the garden to eat (one only excepted) and now to take of that tree! This was high ingratitude; this was like the dye to the wool, which made it crimson. When A.dam’s eyes were opened, and he saw what he had done, well he might be ashamed, and hide himself; to sin in the midst of Paradise, how could lie look God in the face without blushing!

3. In Adam’s sin was discontent: had he not been discontented, he would never have

sought to have altered his condition. Adam, one would think, had enough, — he differed but little from the angels, — he had the robe of innocence to clothe’liim, and the glory of Paradise to crown him, — yet he was not content, he would have more, he would bo above the ordinary rank of creatures. How wide was Adam’s heart, that a whole world could not fill it!

4. Pride, in that he would be like God. This worm, that was but newly cre])t out of the dust, now aspires after Deity; “Ye shall be as gods,” saith Satan, and Adam hoped to have been so indeed; he supposed the tree of knowledge would have anointed his eyes, and made him omniscient. But, by climbing too high, he got a fall.

5. Disobedience. God said, “Thou shalt not cat of the tree;” he would cat of it, thouffh it cost him his life. Disobedience is a sin against equity; it is equal we should serve him from whom we have our subsistence; God gave Adam his allowance, therefore it was but equal he should give God his allegiance; therefore disobedience was against equity. How could God endure to sec his laws trampled on before his face? This made God place a flaming sword at the end of the garden.

6. Curiosity: to meddle with that which was out of his sphere, and did not belong to him. God smote the men of Bethshemish but for looking into the ark, 1 Sam. vi. 19. Adam would be prying into God’s secrets,, and tjvsting what was forbidden.

7. Wantonness: though Adam had a choice of all the other trees, yet his palate grew wanton, and he must have this tree. Like Israel, God sent them manna, angels’ food, aye, but they had an hankering after quails; it was not enough God did sujpj)ly their wants, unless he should satisfy their lusts. Adam had not only for necessity, but for delight; yet his wanton palate lusted after foibiddcn fruit.

8. Sacrilege: the tree of knowledge was none of Adam’s, yet he took of it, and did sacrilegiously rob God of his due. It was counted a great crime in Ilarpalus to rob the temple, and steal the silver vessels; so in Adam to steal fruit from that tree, which God had peculiarly enclosed for himself: Sacrilege is double theft.

OF ORIGINAL SIN.

9. Murder: Adam was a public person, and all his posterity were involved and wrapped up in him, and he sinning:, did at once destroy all Ids posterity, if free grace did not interpose. If Abel’s blood did cry so loud in God’s ears, Gen. iv. 10., “The voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground,” then how loud did the blood of all Adam’s posterity cry against him for vengeance!

10. Presumption: Adam presumed of God’s mercy; he blessed himself saying, he should have peace; he thought, though he did transgress, he should not die, God would sooner reverse his decree, than punish him. High presumption; what an heinous sin then was Adam’s breach of covenant!

Use. One sin may have many sins in it. We are apt to have slight thoughts of sin, it is but a little one. How many sins were in Adam’s sin? O take heed of any sin 1 As in one volume there may be many works bound up, so there may be many sins in one sin.

3%. The dreadful ness of the effect: it hath corrupted man’s nature. How rank is that poison a drop whereof could poison a whole sea! And how deadly is that sin of Adam, that could poison all mankind, and bring a curse upon them, till it be taken away by him who was ’ made a curse for us.’